* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [Call to Order] [00:00:02] GOOD EVENING. TODAY IS TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20TH, 2026, AND I CALL THE ADDISON PLANNING AND ZONING WORK SESSION INTO BEGINNING WHATEVER. LESLIE, I'LL TURN OVER TO YOU. UM, I APOLOGIZE, I JUMPED AHEAD. UM, ITEM TWO IS PUBLIC COMMENT. WHAT ITEM TWO ON THE WORK SESSION IS PUBLIC COMMENT. OH, OKAY. AT, AT THIS TIME, CITIZENS WILL BE ALLOWED TO SPEAK ON ANY OTHER MATTER OTHER THAN PERSONAL MATTERS UNDER LITIGATION FOR A LENGTH OF TIME NOT TO EXCEED THREE MINUTES, NO P AND Z ACTION OR DISCUSSION MAKE TO PLACE PLACE ON ANY MATTER UNTIL SUCH MATTER HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE AGENDA AND POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. IS THERE ANY HERO IN HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK OR ANY ON ONE ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? OKAY. HAVING SEEN NONE, I WILL TURN IT OVER TO LESLIE. I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE TO CLOSE THAT. DO I HAVE TO CLOSE THAT OR IT'S JUST A OKAY, YOU PUT SOMETHING OUTTA ORDER. I GOT ME ALL CONFUSED. OKAY. SORRY. THAT, THAT WAS, THAT CAME WITH, UM, IS THAT A PERMANENT CHANGE? SOME OF THE CHANGES OF THE AGENDA TO ALIGN WITH THE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA? OKAY. SO THEY DO A PUBLIC COMMENT AT THE BEGINNING OF THE WORK SESSION IN CASE THERE'S ANY COMMENTS GENERATED FROM ANY ITEMS ON THE WORK SESSION. SO THAT'S WHERE THAT CAME FROM. BUT, [a. Status update on recent Planning and Zoning  Commission cases and planning policy items.] UM, SO MOVING ON TO ITEM THREE A OF THE WORK SESSION. UM, JUST UPDATE ON RECENT, UM, P AND Z, UM, CASES AND PLANNING POLICY ITEMS. THE ONLY ITEM THAT HAS, UM, MOVED FORWARD SINCE OUR LAST MEETING IS THE VITRUVIAN, UM, DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUEST. UH, THEY HAD SEVERAL WAIVERS. YES. YEAH, THE VOLUME WE HAVE, WE HAVE TO LEAVE THE DOOR OPEN. YEP. SINCE IT'S A PUBLIC MEETING, BUT COREY WOULDN'T ASK THEM IF THEY COULD TONE IT DOWN A WEE BIT. UH, UM, OH, THANKS SCOTT. OKAY. UM, SO I'LL START THREE A OVER AGAIN. SO THIS WAS UPDATE ON RECENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CASES AND POLICY ITEMS. UM, THE ONLY ITEM THAT HAS MOVED FORWARD SINCE OUR LAST MEETING IS THE CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UM, AMENDMENT FOR VITRUVIAN, UM, WHICH IS THE TWO NEW MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS AND AMENITY CENTER AT THE SOUTH, UH, EAST CORNER OF VITRUVIAN. UM, AND THAT WENT TO CITY COUNCIL LAST WEEK AND THE ITEM DIED FOR NO ACTION. UM, SO THEY ARE PLANNING TO RESUBMIT AND START OVER AGAIN FOR CONSIDERATION. WHO WAS THE NO ACTION? US OR THEM? UM, CITY COUNCIL. OKAY. SORRY. 'CAUSE I RECUSED. UH, YEAH, IT WAS, UM, THERE WAS A COUNCIL MEMBER ABSENT, SO IT WAS THREE THREE AND SO IT WAS KIND OF A, A STALEMATE IF YOU WILL. UM, SO THEY WERE GONNA TAKE SOME OF THE FEEDBACK THEY RECEIVED FROM CITY COUNCIL, UM, AND GO BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS. SO WE ARE TENTATIVELY ANTICIPATING THAT TO COME BACK BEFORE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NEXT MONTH AT THE NOVEMBER, UM, MEETING. UM, AND THEN [b. Discussion regarding items on the agenda for the October 20, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.] ITEM THREE B IS JUST, UM, DISCUSSION ON ANY ITEMS FOR, ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING, OCTOBER 20TH. AS YOU CAN SEE, WE HAVE, EXCUSE ME, A VERY FULL AGENDA. EXCUSE ME, A VERY FULL AGENDA. UM, SO I'LL GO THROUGH THE ITEMS ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, UM, AND SEE IF THERE IS ANY, UM, QUESTIONS, UM, THAT STAFF SHOULD BEGIN TO PREPARE FOR THE REGULAR MEETING. UM, BUT OTHER THAN THAT, STAFF WILL, UM, BE PREPARED TO GIVE A FORMAL PRESENTATION DURING THE REGULAR MEETING. UM, SO THE FIRST ITEM IS CONSIDERATION ON THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST MEETING FROM SEPTEMBER 10TH. WERE THERE ANY COMMENTS OR CONCERNS ON THOSE? OKAY. SEEING NONE. UM, MOVE ON TO ITEM FIVE B, WHICH IS, UM, THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW OFFICE BUILDING. UM, THIS IS AT THE SMALL SITE BETWEEN FROST BANK AND IHOP. UM, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CONSIDERED A REZONING REQUEST SEVERAL MONTHS AGO TO REZONE THAT TO COMMERCIAL LIMITED TO ACTUALLY FACILITATE AND ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS OFFICE BUILDING BY, RIGHT? SO THEY HAVE GONE THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND, UM, PER THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, THAT CONSTITUTES A MAJOR SITE PLAN, WHICH COMES BACK TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION. SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS, UM, BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, UM, THAT IS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT ONE? OKAY. MOVING ON TO THE REGULAR ITEM, WHICH IS ALL PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. UM, THE FIRST, WHICH IS SIX A, THIS IS A REPL, UM, FOR INWOOD. UM, THIS IS THE FORMER TUESDAY MORNING SITE. IT'S AT THE, UM, FARTHEST SOUTH POINT, UM, OF ON INWOOD ON THE, WHAT IS THE EAST SIDE. UM, THIS IS, IT CURRENTLY IS ACTUALLY PLOTTED INTO FOUR LOTS AND THEY'RE PROPOSING [00:05:01] TO, UM, MODIFY, MODIFY THAT AND DIVIDE IT INTO THREE LOTS, GENERALLY FOLLOWING THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREAS, UM, TO CREATE THREE NEW, THREE NEW LOTS. UM, WITH THAT, YOU'LL NOTICE THERE IS A CONDITION OF APPROVAL THAT STAFF'S RECOMMENDING THROUGH THIS PROCESS. THEY ARE ACTUALLY, WE, UH, THE TOWN IS GOING THROUGH A PROCESS OF, UM, DEDICATING SOME PRIVATE UTILITIES TO THE OWNERSHIP OF THAT PROPERTY AND THEY WILL TAKE OVER OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF THOSE UTILITIES. UM, AND THE, THE METER WILL ESSENTIALLY BE MOVED BACK TO THE PROPERTY LINE. LESLIE, I HAVE A QUESTION. SO THE UTILITIES ARE NOW IN THE CITY'S PURVIEW AND THEY'RE GONNA TAKE IT ON MM-HMM . WHY, WHY WOULD THEY DO THAT? SO THIS IS THE, UM, EXISTING, UH, EASEMENT THAT IS IN REFERENCE IN THAT CONDITION, UM, IN QUESTION. AND SO WE DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHEN OR WHY OR HOW, UM, BUT THERE WAS A BUILDING THAT WAS BUILT ON TOP OF AN EXISTING CITY EASEMENT AND UTIL PUBLIC UTILITY. UM, THAT IS, THIS WAS MANY, MANY DECADES AGO, LIKELY IN THE SIXTIES. UH, WE HAVE NO DOCUMENTATION OF THIS, UM, HOW THIS OCCURRED. AND SO WITH THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER GOING THROUGH A REDEVELOPMENT PROCESS, THERE WERE PRESENTED SEVERAL OPTIONS OF HOW TO REMEDY THIS CONFLICT. UM, 'CAUSE IF WE NEED TO ACCESS OUR PUBLIC UTILITIES, UM, WE CAN HAVE A BUILDING ON TOP OF THEM. UM, SO ONE OF THOSE INCLUDED REMOVING THE BUILDING. ONE OF THEM INCLUDED PRIVATIZING AND TAKING OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY OF THOSE, UM, UTILITIES. UM, AND THERE WAS A THIRD OPTION. NOW I DON'T EVEN REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. IT WAS BEEN A LONG LONG ROAD TO GET HERE, SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. UM, BUT ULTIMATELY IN COLLABORATION WITH THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER, THE DECISION WAS TO PRIVATIZE THOSE. UM, AND SO LIKE I SAID, IT MOVES THE, THE SEPARATION POINT TO THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE NEW PROPERTY OWNER TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL OF THOSE EASEMENTS, OR EXCUSE ME, ALL OF THOSE UTILITIES. UM, AND ULTIMATELY THE EASEMENT, UH, ONCE THOSE ARE DEDICATED, UM, TO OR PRIVATIZED THAT EASEMENT WOULD BE ABANDONED. I HAVE A QUICK QUESTION JUST FROM MY KNOWLEDGE. SO THE LANDOWNER IS GOING TO TAKE, UH, UH, THE UTILITIES AS A PRIVATE, UH, PIECE WHEN HE SELLS THE FRONT TWO PIECES. HOW DOES THAT, HOW DOES THAT GET HANDLED? YEAH, SO IN THE CONDITION, THERE'S ACTUALLY A REQUIREMENT THAT, UM, IT'S THE, UM, LIKE THE LAST FOUR LINES THERE, STARTING ON THE RIGHT SIDE, IT SAYS FINALLY THE PROPERTY OWNER, UH, WILL RECORD RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS IN THE FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE TOWN TO ENCUMBER THOSE LOTS, UM, TO ENSURE THAT THEY CONTINUE PROVIDING THE PRIVATE WATER AND, AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS TO BE OPERATING AND MAINTAINED. SO THEY WILL ESSENTIALLY CR BE THEIR OWN. UM, YOU CAN LOOK AT IT AS THEIR OWN MINI WATER UTILITY DISTRICT OR THEIR OWN MINI UTILITY DISTRICT. OKAY, THANK YOU. YEAH. SO I'M GONNA ASK A QUESTION THAT MIGHT, UH, INDICATE MY IGNORANCE OF KIND OF HOW THESE UTILITIES ARE KIND OF LAID OUT. BUT IS THERE ANY SORT OF LIKE TRANSFER OF THE WATER OR LINES THAT GO THROUGH TO ADDISON, WHEREAS IF THEY WERE TO, LIKE, FOR EXAMPLE, NEGLECT TO MAINTAIN THEIR UTILITIES IN WHATEVER WAY THAT COULD, COULD IT, COULD IT NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE TOWN IF WE DON'T HAVE OVERSIGHT OVER HOW THEY MANAGE THEIR UTILITY EASEMENTS? NO. SO THIS IS ACTUALLY, UM, AT A DEAD END, WHICH IS WHY THIS HAS POSED SUCH AN ISSUE WITH THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY. SO YOU CAN SEE THAT THE PROPERTY LINES, EXCUSE ME, THE, THE CITY LIMIT LINES AND THE PROPERTY LINES ARE CONSISTENT AT BOTH THE SOUTH AND THE WEST SIDES. AND SO THERE IS ACTUALLY ONE MAIN THAT, THAT THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONNECT TO, AND IT IS AT THE END, OKAY, SO IT IS RUNNING SOUTHBOUND TO THEIR PROPERTY AND ONCE IT HITS THEIR PROPERTY, AND WHEN I SAY THAT, I MEAN EVERYTHING HERE SHOWN IN BLUE, THOSE, THOSE THREE NEW PARCELS, THAT IS ALL IT'S SERVING, IT'S AT THE VERY END. OKAY. SO THERE WOULD ACTUALLY BE A BACKFLOW AT THE SEPARATION POINT, SO THEY'RE NOT GONNA FEED WATER BACK INTO THE PUBLIC SYSTEM. OKAY. YEAH, THAT, THAT MAKES ME FEEL A LITTLE MORE COMFORTABLE. YES. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTION? ALRIGHT, UM, MOVING ON TO SIX B. UM, THIS IS ANOTHER PLAT. UM, THIS IS FOR THE ADDISON AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT. UM, YOU ALL HAVE ACTUALLY CONSIDERED THIS PLAT PRIOR. UM, IT'S FOR RASA. UM, THROUGH THE PROCESS WORKING WITH FRANCHISE UTILITIES, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THERE WAS ACTUALLY AN ADDITIONAL EASEMENT THAT NEEDED MODIFIED. UM, THEY HAVE MODIFIED [00:10:01] THAT, UM, WITH THE, UM, HELP OF THEIR FRANCHISE UTILITY ENCORE AND, UM, HAVE RESUBMITTED FOR CONSIDERATION. SO, UM, AS MENTIONED, THIS IS THE SAME PLAT YOU REVIEWED SEVERAL MONTHS AGO AND, AND APPROVED AT THAT TIME. HOWEVER, THERE IS A, AN EASEMENT MODIFICATION, A NEW EASEMENT FOR FRANCHISE UTILITY HAS BEEN ADDED. AND THEN THE NEXT ITEM IS ANOTHER, UH, REPL. THIS IS FOR THE ADDISON INNOVATION. UM, THIS IS AT ADDISON ROAD AND EXCEL PARKWAY. THIS IS CURRENTLY ONE LOT. IT WAS, UM, APPROVED, UH, PLAN DEVELOPMENT WAS APPROVED, I BELIEVE IN 2023 TO DEVELOP A SECOND PHASE BEHIND, UM, WHAT WAS A FORMER CALL CENTER WITH A VERY LARGE SURFACE PARKING LOT. UM, SO YOU SEE ON THE LEFT HAND SIDE, THAT'S ACTUALLY A, A NEW BUILDING THAT'S BEEN BUILT WITHIN THE LAST THREE YEARS. UM, THAT'S PRIMARILY OFFICE WAREHOUSE AND, EXCUSE ME, THEY'RE PROPOSING TO SUBDIVIDE THE LOT INTO GEN, INTO TWO LOTS GENERALLY, UM, ALLOWING EACH BUILDING TO BE ON ITS OWN LOT. LESLIE, UM, XCEL IS THE STREET ABOVE ON THE NORTH, SO WHEN THEY REPL AND SPLIT IT IN TWO, THERE'S ONE ACCESS POINT ON EXCEL. SO HOW DOES THAT WORK IN TERMS OF PROVIDING ? THERE ARE TWO ACCESS POINTS ON EXCEL AND UM, I, I ONLY SAW THE ONE IN THIS, SO THERE'S ONE, UM, GENERALLY IN THE CENTER WHERE THE PROPERTY LINE IS, AND THEN THERE'S ONE ON THE FAR LEFT SIDE, SO IT'S RIGHT ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE. OKAY. I DON'T HAVE, CAN YOU USE YOUR CURSOR MAYBE OR THE LITTLE TOOL? YEAH. SO THERE'S ONE THERE AND THEN THERE'S ONE ON THE LEFT SIDE RIGHT THERE. YEAH. AND THERE, YEAH, THERE'S ACTUALLY TWO ON ADDISON ROAD AS WELL. AND, BUT I WILL ADD TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, UM, THEY DO HAVE CROSS ACCESS. THAT IS ONE OF THE, THE ITEMS THAT THEY'RE ADDING WITH THE PLOT. ALRIGHT. OH, UM, AND WITH THE CONDITION ON THIS, UM, THERE IS, SO WITH THIS THEY'VE CREATED TWO NEW LOTS. UM, IT WAS PREVIOUSLY ONE LOT AND THEY'RE CREATING TWO NEW ONES. UM, UM, STAFF HAS WORKED, UH, FOR SEVERAL MONTHS WITH THIS, UM, APPLICANT TO GET THIS, UM, PREPARED FOR CONSIDERATION. THERE STILL IS, UM, REALLY ONE MINOR ERROR AND IT'S THAT THE WRITTEN MEETS AND BALANCE DESCRIPTION, THERE IS A, AN ERROR IN THE NUMBERS THAT THEY DON'T, UM, ALIGN WITH THE PLAT EXHIBIT. ONE OF THEM IS LIKE 36.32 AND ONE OF THEM IS LIKE 36.56. WE NEED THEM TO MATCH. UM, IT'S A PRETTY MINOR ERROR, SO WE'RE ASKING, UM, IF, UM, THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION SO CHOOSES TO APPROVE WITH THIS CONDITION SO THAT WE CAN CORRECT THAT ITEM AND BEFORE IT'S RECORDED. ALRIGHT. UH, THE NEXT ITEM IS SIX D. THIS IS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A REP. UM, THE REASON THIS REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS BECAUSE IT FALLS UNDER THE DEFINITION OF, UH, KENNEL COMMERCIAL, WHICH INCLUDES BOARDING AND SELLING OF ANIMALS. SO THIS IS LOCATED, UM, ON INWOOD AT THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE FISH GALLERY AND PET YARD. UM, SOME THINGS THAT THEY, THEY OFFER A WIDE VARIETY OF, OF VARIOUS REPTILES, UM, FOR SALE AS WELL AS ACCESSORIES. UM, AND COREY HAS A LOT MORE DETAILS TO SHARE, BUT ANY, ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE? IT'S A LITTLE UNIQUE. WE ALSO HAVE A, UM, OUR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES WHO OVERSEES ANIMAL SERVICES HERE AS WELL IN CASE THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO THAT. ALRIGHT. NEXT ITEM IS SIX E. THIS IS A PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR AN EXISTING, UM, COMMERCIAL CENTER. IT'S AT THE CORNER OF KELLER SPRINGS AND ADDISON ROAD. UM, AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE BOTH THIS PROPERTY AS WELL AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, BOTH ON THE AGENDA THIS EVENING FOR, UM, UM, VERY SIMILAR, UM, REQUEST. UM, THIS IS, THEY'RE BOTH PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS TO MODIFY THE PERMITTED USES ALLOWED ON THE LOT. THEY ACTUALLY BOTH, OURS IS CURRENTLY ZONED UNDER THE SAME ORDINANCE, WHICH IS, UH, 85 DASH 0 0 6, UM, WHICH ALLOWS FOR THESE USES, OFFICE, WAREHOUSE, SHOWROOM AND RESTAURANT. THEY ALL HAVE DEFINED SQUARE FOOTAGES, WHICH THEY ARE ALLOWED A MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF. UM, AND THEY CANNOT EXCEED THOSE PERCENTAGES OR THESE USES, UM, MAKES IT VERY CHALLENGING, UM, VERY RESTRICTIVE. SO, UM, THE REQUEST, UM, THIS EVENING FOR THIS PARTICULAR PARCEL IS TO ALLOW THE, THE USES PERMITTED WITHIN COMMERCIAL GENERAL EXCEPT MEDICAL CLINIC. UM, IN ADDITION ALLOWS, UH, VOCATIONAL TRADE SCHOOLS, [00:15:01] CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE, AND THEN THE APPLICANT HAS DEFINED VARIOUS MEDICAL AND WELLNESS USES THAT ARE PROPOSED. UM, AND THOSE ARE WHAT'S LISTED HERE IN THIS TABLE. I HAVE A, JUST A GENERAL QUESTION. SO THIS IS, UH, NON-RESIDENTIAL CG IS THE YES. THE NEXT, THE ONE SLIGHTLY LESS IS CL CORRECT AND THERE'S VERY LITTLE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO, BUT THERE ARE A FEW THAT STAND OUT. BUT CAN YOU GIVE US SOME BACKGROUND AS TO WHY THEY PICKED CG VERSUS CL OR WHY YOU WOULD SUPPORT THAT? OKAY. YEAH, SO THE, UM, I DON'T THINK, YEAH, SO THE REASON FOR THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL VERSUS COMMERCIAL LIMITED WAS THE CONSISTENCY WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA, UM, GIVEN, ESPECIALLY GIVEN ITS ADJACENCY, UH, TO THE AIRPORT ACROSS THE STREET TO, UM, THE WEST. SO COMMERCIAL GENERAL TYPICALLY STARTS TO GET CLOSER TO THE MORE INTENSE USES, CLOSER TO THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL. UM, IT'S REALLY THAT IN BETWEEN. UM, AND SO GIVEN BOTH THE ADJACENT USES AND THE CURRENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL MAKES MORE SENSE FROM A LAND USE PERSPECTIVE, BUT I KNOW THAT THIS PARTICULAR APPLICANT HAS, UM, REVIEWED THE, THE LAND USE TABLE AT GREAT LENGTH. SO, AND THEY'RE PRESENT SO WE CAN HAVE A CONVERSATION DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALRIGHT. AND THEN THE NEXT, UM, ITEM IS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST. UM, THIS IS THE SAME REQUEST, UM, GENERALLY, UH, EXPANDING THE PERMITTED USES WITHIN THE EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT. UM, THE REQUEST FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY IS JUST, UH, COMMERCIAL GENERAL AS DEFINED, SO NO MODIFICATIONS BEYOND THAT. UM, ITEM SIX G IS, HAS BEEN, UM, POSTPONED AND THERE'S NO, THERE'S NO ACTION NEEDED FROM THE, UM, P AND Z COMMISSION. AND THEN THE LAST ITEM, WHICH IS H IS CONSIDERATION OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UM, AND, AND AS, AS WELL THE PARKS, OR EXCUSE ME, THE NEW ZONING MAP, WHICH INCLUDES THE A, UH, APPLICATION OF THE, UM, PARK OVERLAY DISTRICT AS WELL. SO THOSE ARE, THERE REALLY HASN'T BEEN ANY, WE'VE PRESENTED THE CHANGES, UM, AT TWO DIFFERENT WORK SESSIONS WITH PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, AS WELL AS TWO DIFFERENT WORK SESSIONS WITH CITY COUNCIL. UM, I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S REALLY BEEN ANY MAJOR, UM, CHANGES SINCE WE'VE LAST PRESENTED. IT'S CONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE'VE, UM, PRESENTED, BUT WE'LL GO THROUGH, UM, AT A HIGH LEVEL THOSE CHANGES AGAIN. UM, AND I KNOW ALAN HAD SENT IN SOME QUESTIONS OR SOME COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS, UM, AND I DON'T, WE HAVE ALSO RECEIVED A PUBLIC COMMENT FORM THAT WAS PROVIDED IN THE ON, IN THE ONLINE SHAREPOINT, UM, BUT ALSO A PAPER COPY WAS PROVIDED AT YOUR, AT YOUR PLACE AS WELL. OH, YOUR MIC CLICKED IT OFF. SORRY. UM, I'M ASSUMING THE RESPONSE TO HIS IS PRETTY MUCH, THAT'S MORE OF A LEGAL RESPONSE ABOUT NON-CONFORMING AND I DON'T THINK REALLY ANYTHING THAT WE NEED TO ADDRESS, CORRECT? I MEAN, HE JUST WANTS NOT, UNLESS IN WRITTEN ABOUT NON-CONFORMITY, HE WANTS DETAILS. THAT TO ME I WOULD THINK LEGAL WOULD HANDLE THAT OR YOUR DEPARTMENT OF SOME SORT. CORRECT. YEAH. IF, IF THE COMMISSION HAS ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT, LIKE TO DIRECT TO STAFF, WE'RE HAPPY TO RESPOND TO THAT. I'VE GOT A QUESTION ON, UH, SECTION 5 5 6 B. UM, YOU KNOW, WE CAN, WE CAN ANSWER IT HERE IN THE, IN THE REGULAR SESSION, BUT, UH, I WAS JUST CURIOUS, MY INTENTION FOR THE, UH, THE PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT PARKING RELIEF OPTION WAS AN OR CONDITION. UM, EITHER YOU ARE IN, YOU CAN BE ANY BUILDING THAT'S, UH, INSIDE THE BOUNDS DESCRIBED AND GET THE PARKING RELIEF, OR YOU CAN BE OUTSIDE THOSE BOUNDS CONFORM TO THOSE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA AND GET THE PARKING RELIEF. IS THAT THE INTENTION HERE OR IS IT, ARE WE TRYING TO HAVE THE BOUNDS SET THE ABSOLUTE LIMITS AND THEN YOU ALSO HAVE TO COMPLY WITH THE ADDITIONAL THREE? YEAH, SO WE EVALUATED THAT AND WE, LIKE I SAID, HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH BOTH P AND Z AND COUNCIL ON THAT ITEM. AND THE FEEDBACK WE RECEIVED FROM COUNCIL WAS TO KEEP THE BOUNDARY OF ADDISON CIRCLE MM-HMM . AND THEN WE ADD THEN BASED UPON THE OTHER CONVERSATIONS ADDED IN THE, UM, QUALIFIERS TO THAT. SO IT WASN'T A BLANKET APPLICATION, THAT WAS THE FEEDBACK THAT WAS RECEIVED AT CITY COUNCIL. HAPPY TO CONTINUE THAT, THAT DISCUSSION. [00:20:01] YEAH, MAYBE WE CAN BRING THAT UP. I MIGHT POLITELY INSIST. UM, BUT UH, WE CAN, WE CAN HANDLE THAT IN THE REGULAR SESSION. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? ALRIGHT, WE WILL, THAT CONCLUDES ALL THE ITEMS ON THE AGENDA, SO WE'LL LOOK FORWARD TO PRESENTING THOSE. OKAY. COMMISSIONER, ANY COMMENTS? OKAY, WITH THAT, WE'LL OFFICIALLY CLOSE THE WORK SESSION, UH, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 25TH, 2026, AND RECONVENE AT 6:00 PM FOR REGULAR UH, COMMISSION MEETING. THANK YOU. TODAY [Call to Order] IS TUESDAY, OCTOBER 20TH, 2026. I NOW CALL THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ADDISON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO ORDER. WE HAVE A QUORUM OF ALL SEVEN COMMISSIONERS PRESENT. UM, AS WE DO AT THE BEGINNING OF ALL MEETINGS. PLEASE JOIN US FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SERVES IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY TO THE TOWN EVALUATING, PLANNING, ZONING AND SUBDIVISION PROPOSALS AND PRESENTING RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL ON MATTERS OF LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POLICY. THE COMMISSION'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO ENSURE RESPONSIBLE LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT BY ADHERING TO THE ESTABLISHED PLANNING PRINCIPLES AND OVERSEEING THE ADMINISTRATION OF ZONING AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS. THESE EFFORTS ARE INTENDED TO UPHOLD THE SAFETY, WELFARE AND OVERALL BEING OF THE RESIDENTS, THE WORKFORCE AND THE VISITORS. IF ANYONE WISHES TO SPEAK DURING THE MEETING, PLEASE COMMENT, PLEASE COMPLETE A COMMENT CARD AND RETURN IT TO STAFF. I'D LIKE TO REMIND EVERYONE THAT IF YOU DO SPEAK, PLEASE KEEP YOUR COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES OR LESS AND REFRAIN FROM ASKING ANY DIRECT QUE DIRECT QUESTIONS TO THE COMMISSIONERS. HOWEVER, THE COMMISSIONERS MAY AT THEIR DISCRETION ASK YOU YOU QUESTIONS. ANY ANSWERS WILL NOT BE COUNTED AGAINST YOUR THREE MINUTES. ADDITIONALLY, WHEN YOU COME, PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS MISSING THE PARTY OUT THERE. UM, OUR FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS IS TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. ALL ITEMS LISTED IN THE CON CONTENTA ARE CONSIDERED ROUTINE BY PLANNING ZONING QUESTION, AND WE WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION WITH NO IN BILL ASSOCIATION. OKAY, SO ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, UM, UM, IT SAYS ITEM NUMBER FOUR IS THE PUBLIC COMMENT. I ALREADY READ THAT STATEMENT. OH, BUT YEAH, NO, YOU READ THE STATEMENT, BUT I THINK PUBLIC COMMENT OPEN IT. SORRY. THEY CHANGED THE PROCEDURE ON ME. OKAY. SORRY. WE WILL NOW OPEN THIS UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. AT THIS TIME, CITIZENS ARE ALLOWED TO SPEAK ON ANY MATTER OTHER THAN PERSONAL MATTERS. UNDER LITIGATION FOR LENGTH OF TIME NOT TO EXCEED THREE MINUTES, NO MATTER NO P AND Z ACTION OR DISCUSSION MAY TAKE PLACE ON ANY MATTER UNTIL SUCH MATTER HAS BEEN PLACED ON THE AGENDA AND POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW. IS THERE ANYBODY PRESENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND SPEAK OR ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY, HAVING SEEN NONE, I CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION, PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION. NOW [Consent Agenda] MOVING ON TO CONSENT AGENDA. UM, CONSIDER ACTIONS ON THE MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 10TH, 2026, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING COMMISSIONERS. ANY COMMENTS? DO I HAVE A MOTION? OH, SORRY. LET'S GO. B, CONSIDER ACTION ON PLAN DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING ON 0.729 ACRES LOCATED AT ONE COMMERCIAL DRIVE CASE A ZR 2026 DASH 0 0 8 0 SLASH ONE COMMERCIAL DRIVE OFFICE. COMMISSIONERS ANY COMMENTS? HAVEN'T SEEN ANY? DO I HAVE ANY MOTION I MOVE APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA? I HAVE A SECOND. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. ANY OPPOSED? HAVING NONE CONSENT AGENDA IS APPROVED. [a. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a replat for the Inwood Park North Addison, Block A, Lots 1R, 2R, and 3R, to modify lot boundaries and dedicate easements on currently developed property on 12.72± acres generally located on the west side of Inwood Road at the Town of Addison southern town limits, addressed as 14601, 14603, 14621, and 14639 Inwood Road. Case SUBR-2026-0006/Inwood Park North Addison Replat.] NEXT WE'LL MOVE TO REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON A RELA FOR THE INWOOD PARK NORTH ADD ADDISON PROPERTY BLOCK A LOTS ONE R TWO R THREE R TO MODIFY LOT BOUNDARIES AND DEDICATED EASEMENTS ON CURRENT DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY ON 12.72 APPROXIMATE ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INWOOD ROAD AT THE TOWN OF ADDISON SOUTHERN TOWN. LIMITS ADDRESS 1 4 6 0 1 1 4 6 0 3 1 46 21 AND 1 46 39 INWOOD ROAD CASE SUBR 2020 6 0 0 6 INWOOD ROAD, NORTH PARK, EXCUSE ME, INWOOD PARK NORTH ADDISON REPL, [00:25:02] LESLIE LESLIE KNIGHT, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. UM, THIS REQUEST IS A REPL, UH, FOR CURRENTLY FOUR SUBJECT PROPERTIES, UM, PROPOSED TO REPL INTO THREE SUBJECT, EXCUSE ME, THREE PROPERTIES. UM, GENERALLY FOLLOWING, UM, PROPERTY LINES TO SEGMENT THE EXIST. THREE EXISTING BUILDINGS INTO THREE SEPARATE LOTS. UH, IN ADDITION, AS MENTIONED, UH, THIS ALSO INCLUDES DEDICATION OF EASEMENTS, UM, TO ALLOW THE RE AND REINVESTMENT OF THIS AND REUSE OF THIS PROPERTY, UM, BEFORE YOU IS THE PROPOSED REPL. UM, ONE, UM, NOTABLE ITEM FOR THIS PARTICULAR REPL IS THAT, UM, ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL INCLUDES, UM, A CONDITION TO ALLOW FOLLOWING THE RECORDING OF THIS PLAT TO ALLOW THE FACILITATION OF PRIVATIZATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. FOLLOWING THAT, THE EXECUTION OF THAT, UM, THE TOWN WILL GO THROUGH A PROCESS TO ABANDON AN EXISTING PUBLIC, UH, UTILITY EASEMENT THAT CURRENTLY IS PRESENT ON THIS PLAT, UM, BUT WILL NOT DO SO UNTIL THOSE ARE ADEQUATELY TRANSFERRED, UM, INTO THE PROPERTY OWNER. UM, THIS AREA SHOWED IN RED GENERALLY IDENTIFIES THE, THAT EASEMENT IN QUESTION. UM, AS A PART AS DEFINED IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, UH, STAFF DID PROVIDE NOTICE TO ALL PROPERTY MANAGERS FROM THE 200 FEET OF THE SITE WITHIN ADDISON, AND THAT INCLUDED EIGHT RECIPIENTS. UH, WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES TO THAT NOTICE. UM, STAFF HAS EVALUATED THE PROPOSED REPL, UM, AND DETERMINED IT DOES, UH, MEET AND COMPLIES WITH THE TOWN SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT, UH, REGULATIONS AS REQUIRED. UM, AND ONCE AGAIN, TO FACILITATE THE TRANSFER OF THOSE PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEMS TO PRIVATE OWNERSHIP STAFF RECOMMENDS, UM, IN CONJUNCTION IN COLLABORATION WITH OUR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AS WELL AS OUR CITY ATTORNEY. UM, THE FOLLOWING, UM, CONDITION THAT'S ALSO INCLUDED IN THE PACKET. UM, AND GENERALLY THIS, UH, REQUIRES THAT THE APPROVAL OF THIS REPL IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION OF THE PROPERTY OWNER TAKE OVER THE OWNERSHIP OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLICLY OWNED WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS THAT ARE LOCATED ON THIS PROPERTY THAT SOLELY SERVE, UM, THE, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IN QUESTION. UM, AND THERE'S SOME ADDITIONAL, UM, CONTENT WITHIN THIS CONDITION TO ALLOW THE FACILITATION OF THAT. JUST A QUICK QUESTION, IS THERE ANY ALLOWANCE IN THAT EASEMENT FOR FIRE ACCESS OR THAT IS THAT THERE, THERE CURRENTLY IS, BUT AS A PART OF THIS PLAT, UM, YOU SEE THAT WHAT LOOKS LIKE A CUL-DE-SAC, GENERALLY THE, THE CIRCLE IN THE MIDDLE THAT'S ACTUALLY A NEW ACCESS EASEMENT THAT IS BEING DEDICATED, UM, THAT OVERLAPS WITH THAT. SO WHEN THAT OTHER EASEMENT IS ABANDONED, THERE WILL BE ONE THAT CURRENTLY STILL EXISTS FOR FIRE LANE. SO IT, IT IS FOR FIRE LANE AND EMERGENCY ACCESS AND SO FORTH. OKAY, THANKS. UM, YEAH AND UM, WITH THAT I'LL STAND FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND THIS ITEM IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? COMMISSIONER IS THE APPLICANT HERE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY. UM, ANYONE? I'LL OPEN IT UP AT THIS TIME. I'LL OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IF ANYONE HAS ANY COMMENTS, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. PLEASE STATE NAME AND ADDRESS. OKAY, ANYONE ONLINE HAVING SEEN NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. UM, ANY OTHER DISCUSSIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I WILL MOVE FOR THE APPROVAL OF CASE SUR DASH 2 0 26 DASH 0 0 6 INWOOD PARK NORTH ADDISON REPL WITH THE CONDITIONS STATED AS, UH, BY THE STAFF ANALYSIS. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY. MOTION CARRIES [b. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a replat for Addison Airport Industrial District, Block A, Lot 14R, for an office/hangar development on 1.5+/- acres located at northeast corner of the Wright Brothers Drive and Wiley Post Road intersection, addressed as 15500 Wright Brothers Drive. Case SUBR-2026-0007/Addison Airport Industrial District.] ON TO THE NEXT ITEM. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING. PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON A REPL FOR THE ADDISON AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT BLOCK, A LOT 14 R FOR AN OFFICE HANGAR DEVELOPMENT ON APPROXIMATELY 1.5 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WRIGHT BROTHERS DRIVE IN WILEY POST ROAD INTERSECTION ADDRESSED AS 1 5 5 0 0. WRIGHT BROTHERS DRIVE, CASE SUBR DASH 2026 DASH 0 0 0 7. ADDISON AIRPORT, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, LESLIE, A TURNOVER STAFF REPORT. UH, LESLIE NIFE, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. UM, THIS REQUEST IS A REPL, UM, TO, UM, FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW OFFICE HANGER AT THE, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, UM, AT THE, ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. UM, THIS IS NOT, THIS RELIGHT IS NOT PROPOSING TO MODIFY ANY OF THE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINES. IT IS, UM, TO MODIFY EASEMENTS ONCE AGAIN TO FACILITATE THE, UM, DEVELOPMENT OF THAT NEW OFFICE HANGER BUILDING. UM, THE COMMISSION DID CONSIDER THIS RELA SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, HOWEVER, THERE [00:30:01] HAVE BEEN SOME, UH, MODIFICATIONS TO THE EASEMENTS, WHICH IS WHY IT'S BACK BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING. UM, SO STAFF IS, UH, REQUESTING CONSIDERATION OF THIS. UM, THERE WAS A, SINCE THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NOTICE WAS PROVIDED TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SITE, INCLUDING EIGHT RECIPIENTS. WE'VE NOT RECEIVED ANY RESPONSE TO THAT NOTICE. UM, AND THROUGH THE EVALUATION PROCESS, STAFF DETERMINED IT DOES COMPLY WITH THE TOWN SUBDIVISION, UM, AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. I'D BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. UM, AND AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. COMMERS ANY QUESTION, TYLER OR MIKE ? OH, THANKS. LESLIE IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK. OKAY. WITH THAT I'LL OPEN UP TO PUBLIC COMMENT. ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ISSUE OR IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE THAT WOULD LIKE TO OKAY, HAVING HEARD NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTIONS, EXCUSE ME, PORTION OF THE MEETING. UH, IS THERE ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION COMMISSIONERS HAVING SEEN NONE? DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MOTION TO APPROVE. ITEM SUBR DASH 2 0 2 6 DASH 0 0 7 ADDISON AIRPORT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REPLAY. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? HAVING NONE. ITEM PASSES. [c. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a replat for Excel Phase 1 Block A, Lot 1R and Lot 2 on 12.22+/- acres located at southwest corner of the Addison Road and Excel Parkway intersection, addressed as 16675 Addison Road and 4560 Excel Parkway. Case SUBR-2026-0008/Excel Phase 1 Replat.] UH, ONTO THE NEXT ITEM. HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING. PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON REPL FOR EXCEL PHASE ONE BLOCK A LOT ONE R AND LOT TWO TWO ON APPROXIMATELY 12 POINT 22 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ADDISON ROAD AND XCEL PARKWAY INTERSECTION ADDRESSED AS 1 6 6 7 5 ADDISON ROAD AND 45 60 SOUTH PARKWAY. CASE SUBR DASH 2026 DASH 0 0 0 8. I GOT THAT RIGHT. THREE ZEROS EXCEL, PHASE ONE REPL LESLIE TO REMEMBER STAFF REPORT LESLIE I, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. UM, THIS REQUEST IS A REPL TO SUBDIVIDE IN A ONE EXISTING PARCEL INTO TWO. UM, GENERALLY, UH, ALLOWING THE TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS TO EACH BE ON THEIR OWN LOT. UM, THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, UH, RECEIVED A, UM, ZONING APPROVAL IN APPROXIMATELY 2023 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, UM, OF THE WESTERN BUILDING. UM, THIS SITE WAS FORMERLY A CALL CENTER AND HAD A VERY LARGE PARKING LOT. UM, SO BOTH UM, BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN, UH, THE EXISTING BUILDING HAD BEEN REPURPOSED IN THE NEW BUILDING CONSTRUCTED. UM, THIS REPL AS MENTIONED WOULD ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THESE TWO, UM, BUILDINGS ON TWO SEPARATE LOTS. UM, AS SHOWN BEFORE YOU ON THE REPL, UM, THE, IN ADDITION TO SUBDIVIDING THE PROPERTY, THERE'S ALSO EASEMENTS BEING ESTABLISHED TO FACILITATE CROSS ACCESS, SHARED UTILITIES AND SO FORTH. UM, BETWEEN THE TWO, THE TWO PARCELS AS THEY WERE, UM, AS MENTIONED, DEVELOPED TOGETHER UNDER ONE PARCEL. UH, STAFF DID PROVIDE NOTICE TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SITE, INCLUDING 12 RECIPIENTS. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES TO THAT REQUEST. UM, STAFF HAS, UH, REVIEW WORKED WITH THE APPLICANT AND REVIEWED THIS RE PLAT AND DETERMINED THERE ARE, THERE IS CURRENTLY STILL AN ERROR ON THE PLAT. UM, THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE PLAT EXHIBIT AND THE WRITTEN MEETS AND BOUNDS. HOWEVER, IT'S VERY MINOR IN NATURE AND TO AVOID, UM, DELAYING AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS, UM, TO THE NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. UH, HEARING, UH, STAFF IS ASKING, UM, IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SO CHOOSES TO APPROVE THIS REPL TO APPROVE WITH THE CONDITION THAT PRIOR TO RECORDING, UM, THE APPLICANT MUST FIX THAT DISCREPANCY, REVISING, UM, THE MEETS AND BOUNDS OR PROPERTY BEARINGS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ALIGN. I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? NO. OKAY. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK? OKAY, AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN UP A PUBLIC HEARING THIS ITEM, DO WE HAVE ANYONE WHO WISHES TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME EITHER HERE OR IN ONLINE? NOPE. HAVING SEEN NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THIS HEARING. UM, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, DO I HAVE A MOTION? YEAH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE. APPROVAL OF CASE, UH, SUBR 2026 DASH 0 0 0 8 EXCEL PHASE ONE RELA, UH, WITH CONDITIONS THAT THEY, UH, MAKE THE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE STAFF REPORT. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY, MOTION CARRIES. [d. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) for property located at 15003 Inwood Road, Suite C that is currently zoned Commercial General (CG), for Kennel, Commercial to allow for a reptile pet store. Case 1966-SUP/DFW Reptarium SUP.] NEXT ON THE ITEM IS HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUP FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 5 0 0 3 INWOOD ROAD, SUITE C THAT IS CURRENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL [00:35:01] GENERAL CG FOR KENNEL COMMERCIAL TO ALLOW FOR THE REPTILE PET STORE CASE. 1966 SU SLASH DFW REP SUI DUNNO IF I SAID THAT RIGHT, COREY, TURN OVER FOR STAFF REPORT. UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. COREY BECK, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. I HAVE FOR YOU TONIGHT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST FOR DFW REP LOCATED, PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED AT 1,503 INWOOD ROAD, SUITE C. UM, THE REP, THE DFW REPT IS A FULL SERVICE SPECIALTY PET STORE THAT OFFERS, UH, REPTILES, AMPHIBIANS, AND VERTEBRATES AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS FOR THOSE ANIMALS, INCLUDING HABITATS, FOOD, UH, AND ACCESSORIES IF APPROVED, THIS WOULD BE THEIR SECOND LOCATION IN DFW. THEIR FIRST IS ACTUALLY IN PLANO. UM, AND THEY EMPHASIZE REPTILE EDUCATION TO REALLY ENSURE THAT THE ANIMALS ARE TAKEN CARE OF AT THEIR STORE AS WELL AS, UH, WHEN THEY ARE PURCHASED BY, UM, CUSTOMERS. AND THEIR STOREFRONTS DO INCLUDE CUSTOM BUILT HABITATS. UM, AGAIN, PROMOTING THAT ANIMAL HEALTH, UH, FOR IT BEING ON DISPLAY FOR VISITORS OF THE STORE AS WELL. UM, AND THESE IMAGES ARE FROM THEIR PLANO STORES OR PLANO STORE, UH, FROM THEIR VARIOUS GOOGLE REVIEWS. UM, JUST TRYING TO SHOW WHAT UH, THEY REALLY HAVE IN THEIR STORE, UH, FOR IT BEING A PET STORE. LIKE I MENTIONED, THE REQUEST IS FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A KENNEL, UH, COMMA COMMERCIAL. UM, AND ESSENTIALLY THE REASON THAT THEY'RE HAVING TO REQUEST THAT AS THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS THAT A KENNEL COMMERCIAL IS AN ESTABLISHMENT WHERE A BUSINESS IS INVOLVED IN BOARDING, BREEDING, BUYING, KEEPING, LETTING FOR HIRE, TRAINING OR SELLING OF DOGS, CATS, AND OTHER DOMESTICATED ANIMALS. UM, AND, UH, THE REPTILES AND OTHER ANIMALS THAT THEY SELL WOULD FALL UNDER OTHER DOMESTICATED ANIMALS. UM, SO THE PROPERTY IS ZONED COMMERCIAL GENERAL IN OUR TABLE OF USES. IT DOES REQUIRE SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE, UM, FOR THAT ZONING DISTRICT. THERE ARE NO SITE IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED, UM, SINCE THE PROPERTY WAS ACTUALLY REDEVELOPED IN 2020 TO, UM, COMPLY WITH THE PARKING AND LANDSCAPING AND SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT ALONG INWOOD AT THAT TIME. UM, SO THE, A NEWER TENANT OR THIS TENANT WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO BRING THE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH, THEY THINK BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY BEEN BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE. AND YOU'LL SEE ON HERE THAT THE YARD DOG IS THE SUITE TO THE NORTH. UM, FISH GALLERY IS ACTUALLY ON, UH, JUST SOUTH OF IT IN THE, UM, ON THE CORNER OF THE BUILDING AND THEY DO HAVE A VACANT SUITE IN THE BACK. THERE WAS A VETERINARIAN CLINIC BACK THERE. UH, BUT THAT HAS SINCE BEEN VACATED. UM, THIS IS THE FLOOR PLAN. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S VERY, UM, PET, IT'S PET STORE. UM, ESSENTIALLY A BIG BOX WITH, UH, SOME, UH, AREA FOR CAGES AND HABITATS FOR ANIMALS. AND THEN THEY HAVE RETAIL AND UM, UH, UH, VARIOUS ACCESSORIES THROUGHOUT THE STORE AS WELL. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT USES BECAUSE THE DESTINATION HAS REALLY BECOME A PLACE FOR PET OWNERS AND OTHER PET RELATED BUSINESSES AS WE ALREADY HAVE TWO THAT ARE IN THAT AREA AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS, UM, MENTIONED THAT THAT IS THEIR GOAL IS TO MAKE A DESTINATION FOR PET OWNERS, UM, WHICH HE'S ON THE RIGHT TRACK FOR THAT. UH, IT'S ALSO AJA OR, UH, COMPLY COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT USES BECAUSE THERE'S NO RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE AREA. THERE ARE HOTELS, BUT THERE ARE NO, UH, SINGLE FAMILY MULTIFAMILY, ANYTHING LIKE THAT, UM, THAT COULD CAUSE, UM, CONFLICTS WITH HAVING, UH, AN AN ANIMAL DESTINATION. UH, WE STAFF DID NOTICE WITH EVERYONE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND, UH, THAT WAS NINE RECIPIENTS. WE'VE RECEIVED NO RESPONSES AND WE'VE REVIEWED THE PROPOSAL AND IT IS IN COMPLIANCE OR IT COMPLIES WITH ALL TOWN, UH, POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. UM, AND WE DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM DFW REPT HERE TONIGHT THAT CAN ANSWER QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. AS WELL AS, UM, RAY MENDEZ, OUR, UH, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OVER ANIMAL SERVICES. THANKS COREY. QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS FOR COREY? SO I'M NOT A REPTILE OWNER, SO I MAY COME ACROSS A LITTLE NAIVE. UM, SO WE HAVE A FISH GALLERY AND A REPTILE, POTENTIAL REPTILE FACILITY. IS THERE OVERLAP THERE OR MAYBE THIS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THE APPLICANT? 'CAUSE I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND ALL THE DIFFERENCE. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. UM, UH, [00:40:01] I CAN LET THE APPLICANT ANSWER THAT. UM, IF THEY ARE READY. WELL, WHILE I'VE GOT JEFFREY OR COREY. UM, SO THE APPROVAL OF THIS IS BASICALLY THE BROADER APPROVAL FOR A PET FACILITY. SO ARE THERE RESTRICTIONS AS TO PREVENTING THEM FROM MORPHING INTO A LARGER OPERATION WITH OTHER ANIMALS BEYOND REPTILES? Y THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO, UH, UM, SELL DOGS, CATS, UM, ANYTHING ALONG THAT, UM, AS LONG AS IT FALLS WITHIN THAT DEFINITION BECAUSE THE REQUEST IS FOR THAT FOR A KENNEL COMMERCIAL, WHICH IS SPECIFIC FOR THEIR SUITE THOUGH. UM, 'CAUSE IT IS JUST FOR THIS ONE SUITE. UM, ANY OTHER USES THAT WOULD POTENTIALLY REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK FOR, UH, THAT SPECIAL USE PERMIT IF THEY WENT INTO LIKE ANOTHER, UH, SUITE ON SITE THAT'S LOCATION, NOT NOT FUNCTION MY BAD. I'M SORRY. UM, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO EXPAND INTO THE CATS AND DOGS, UM, COMPONENT OF THE, THE DEFINITION. UM, UH, SO ANYTHING THAT FALLS UNDER THAT DEFINITION, IF THEY CHOSE TO, UM, GO INTO THAT AREA, THEY COULD. I MEAN, I THINK IT'S A GREAT CONCEPT. I LIKE THE IDEA OF CREATING THE SYNERGY. UH, AND SO I'M, I'M VERY MUCH APPRECIATIVE OF THAT. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. YEAH, THANKS. ANYTHING ELSE FOR CORY? OKAY, NOW I WANNA MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND. SO I THINK IT RAISES A GOOD POINT BECAUSE THIS REPTAR SEEMS LIKE A A A FINE BUSINESS AND DEDICATED TO THE WELFARE OF THE ANIMALS. THERE ARE CERTAIN KENNELS THAT I HAVE LIKE CONCERNS ABOUT, LIKE THERE'S LIKE PUPPY DREAMS RIGHT OFF CARROLLTON. SO SEMI-RELATED TO THIS, UM, IT TRANSFER IT'S BY THE SUITE. IF DFW REP RIUM WAS TO SOMEDAY VACATE IN THE PROPERTY ORDER TO RE RESELL, WOULD THEY NEED TO GET A NEW SUP, UH, LESLIE KNIGHT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, UM, WITH THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT, THE FLOOR PLAN AND THE SITE PLAN THAT ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE PRESENTATION, THOSE WOULD ALSO BE CODIFIED WITHIN THAT ORDINANCE. AND SO IF THERE'S ANY MAJOR RENOVATIONS OR CHANGES TO THAT FLOOR PLAN. UM, SO FOR EXAMPLE, UH, WHAT THEY'RE CURRENTLY PROPOSING FROM A REP STANDPOINT, UM, IS, IS QUITE UNIQUE WHEN YOU COMPARE IT TO LIKE BOARDING, UH, DOGS AS AN EXAMPLE. UM, THOSE REQUIRE MUCH MORE ROBUST FACILITIES. AND SO SOMETHING LIKE THAT WOULD VERY MUCH FALL OUTSIDE OF THE ALLOWANCES WITHIN THIS FLOOR PLAN. UM, AND SO IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT IF THEY WERE TO TRY TO EXPAND INTO DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANIMALS, UM, OUTSIDE OF THE REPTILE SPHERE, UM, THEY WOULD NEED TO COME BACK FOR A SPECIAL USE PER A NEW SPECIAL USE PERMIT. OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR COREY? OKAY, THANKS COREY. IF THE APPLICANT'S HERE AND WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORDS, PLEASE. DREW MCCLURE, 1930 SOUTHSIDE DRIVE. MY NAME'S DREW MCCLURE AND I'M GONNA BE THE RUNNING THIS, UH, DR REPT. A LITTLE BACKGROUND ABOUT MEME, I LOVE ANIMALS MY WHOLE LIFE. UM, I EVEN GOT A DEGREE IN ZOOLOGY AT OKLAHOMA STATE, SO GO POKES. BUT I REALLY LIKE TO EMPHASIZE ON EDUCATING PEOPLE ON ANIMALS AND THAT'S THE MAIN THING. THERE'S SO MUCH INFORMATION OUT THERE. UM, SO FOR US IN OUR FACILITY, WE LIKE TO REALLY EDUCATE AND PROMOTE NATURALISTIC ENVIRONMENTS FOR THESE GUYS. THAT'S THE OTHER THING. YOU KNOW, YOU GET THESE ANIMALS AND YOU CAN SEE THEY GET TAKEN A VERY ROUGH SHAPES, BUT FOR US, WE HAVE TO HAVE PROOF OF SETUP. SO THEY HAVE TO HAVE A SETUP IN ORDER TO GET AN ANIMAL. SO AT THE END OF THE DAY, WHAT WE LIKE TO DO HERE IS WE FOCUS ON AMPHIBIANS, REPTILES, AND INVER. NO DOGS, NO CATS, NO MAMMALS, NOTHING LIKE THAT. AND WE ARE TRYING TO PROVIDE THE BEST CARE FOR THESE ANIMALS. AT THE END OF THE DAY. THAT'S MY JOB. MY JOB IS TO PROVIDE A FAMILY WITH ANIMALS THAT THEY CAN LOVE AND CARE ON. AND THAT'S BASICALLY THE, THE WHOLE GIST OF THIS. I WANT TO, THE LOVE FOR MY ANIMALS, I WANT TO PROMOTE ON OTHER PEOPLE. AND IT'S REALLY COOL TO SEE YOUNG KIDS COME INTO THE SHOP AND SEE THAT ENTHUSIASTIC, UM, JUST LOVE FOR ANIMALS AND THE BUSINESS HAS GROWN SO MUCH. I MEAN, I'VE BEEN A PART OF THIS BUSINESS FOR ABOUT FIVE OR SIX YEARS AND IT, IT HAS EXPANDED SO WELL. UM, AND HOPEFULLY WE'LL HAVE MORE SHOPS HERE TO COME, COME TO THE FUTURE, BUT I DO MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIASED, BUT I DO BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE ONE OF THE BEST PEST SHOPS IN THE NATION. SO, UM, I HOPE YOU GUYS CONSIDER EVERYTHING AND WE HAVE NO ISSUES. THANK YOU. ANY, ANY QUESTIONS? QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM WHAT VARIETIES OF ANIMALS ARE YOU SELLING RIGHT NOW? SO ANIMALS WE'RE SELLING RIGHT NOW, SO WE'RE SELLING FROGS, LIZARDS. UM, WHEN IT COMES TO LIZARDS, IT'S A VARIETY OF STUFF FROM BLUE TONGUE, S SKINS, FRILLED LIZARDS, BEARDED DRAGONS, [00:45:01] LEOPARD GECKOS, UM, AND SOME VARIOUS OTHER TYPES OF, UM, OTHER LIKE SMALLER GECKOS. AND THEN WE DO INVERTS AND INVERTS IS GONNA BE STUFFED WITH ALL THE BUGS. SO WE DO, UM, DEATH FAINTING BEETLES ARE VERY POPULAR. THEY'RE BEETLES THAT KIND OF LIKE FLIP OVER AND FAINT. UM, AND THEN WE SAW VARIOUS SPIDERS TOO. THAT'S SURPRISINGLY A VERY POPULAR ONE, UM, OUT OF THE BUNCH. UM, YOU'D BE VERY SURPRISED ON THAT. JUMPING SPIDERS IS A VERY, VERY, VERY POPULAR RIGHT NOW. UM, AND THEN, UM, YOU KNOW, THE, AND THEN WE DO SELL FEEDERS TOO, SO WE SELL ROACHES AND RATS AND STUFF LIKE THAT TO, TO HELP THAT. AND WE DO DO SNAKES. WE DON'T DO ANYTHING BIG SNAKES, SO EVERYTHING'S GONNA STAY AROUND ABOUT THAT SIX FEET KIND OF AREA. UM, I KNOW THAT SOUNDS KIND OF SMALL, BUT . UM, BUT UM, BUT YEAH, THEN WE DO SELL SNAKES. SO WE SELL YOUR BALL PYTHONS, YOUR CORN, SNAKES, RAT SNAKES SOMETIMES YOU SEE AROUND YOUR HOUSE. UM, BUT YEAH, I, I DON'T, UM, I LIKE TO KEEP THE ANIMALS THAT I SELL. IT'S VERY COMMON STUFF. IT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU SEE IN THE, THAT YOU WOULD NORMALLY GET. YES, WE MIGHT HAVE RARE STUFF, BUT WE'RE NOT SELLING MONKEYS OR TIGERS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. THAT'S NOTHING NEAR WHAT WE ARE. OUR ENVISION IS NOTHING LIKE THAT. NOTHING LIKE THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, THANK YOU SIR. AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN UP FOR COMMENT, PUBLIC COMMENT, HEARING FOR THIS ISSUE. DOES ANYONE LIKE TO COME SPEAK OR IS THERE ANYONE ONLINE THAT WOULD SPEAK? OKAY, HAVING HEARD NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THIS. UM, ANY OTHER FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS? HAVING SEEN NONE? DO I HAVE A MOTION? I WILL MOVE FOR THE APPROVAL OF CASE 1966 SUP DASH DFW REP. DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? AYE. MOTION CARRIES. CONGRATULATIONS. [e. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a request to amend the permitted use and development standards for Planned Development, Ordinance No. O85-006, for a 3.48+/- acre property generally located north of Keller Springs Road and east of Addison Road, and addressed as 4801-4849 Keller Springs Road. Case 1967-Z/Gateway Centre PD Amendment.] UM, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PERMIT USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE OH EIGHT FIVE DASH ZERO SIX FOR A APPROXIMATE 3.48 ACRE PROPERTY. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AND EAST OF ADDISON ROAD AND ADDRESSED AS 48 0 1 TO 48 49 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD CASE, 1967 DASH Z GATEWAY CENTER, PD AMENDMENT. COREY, I'LL TURN IT OVER FOR STAFF REPORT. COREY BECK, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. TONIGHT I HAVE A PLAN DEVELOPMENT, UH, AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY FOR 40 804,801 TO 4,849 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD. UM, IT IS AT THE CORNER OF KELLER SPRINGS AND ADDISON ROAD. UM, SO I I WANNA MAKE SURE, UM, WE, THAT STAFF CLARIFIES THE REQUEST IS FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT TO ADD USES TO, UM, THIS IS NOT A REZONE OF THE PROPERTY, BUT, UM, IN BEFORE 1985, THE, UH, ORIGINAL ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY WAS COMMERCIAL AND THAT JUST ALLOWED TYPICAL COMMERCIAL USES. AND THEN 1985 THERE, THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED TO PLAN DEVELOPMENT, WHICH ESTABLISHED A PD FOR FOUR USES. THAT INCLUDED OFFICE, SHOWROOM WAREHOUSE AND RESTAURANT, AND THEN THE INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE PROPERTY AS WELL. AND THEN TODAY I HAVE THE, UM, PD AMENDMENT, UM, FOR YOU TO ALLOW FOR A BROADER RANGE OF USES. LIKE I MENTIONED, THE PERMIT, THE CURRENT PERMITTED USES ARE RATHER RESTRICTIVE. UM, THIS CAUSES PROBLEMS WITH BEING ABLE TO, UH, GET TENANTS, UM, BECAUSE IF THEY FALL OUTSIDE OF THESE FOUR USES, UM, GETTING A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, UM, IS NOT, UH, DUAL, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT WITHIN THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY. SO, UM, THERE HAS BEEN SOME ISSUES AND WE ARE HERE TO, UH, POTENTIALLY AMEND THE, UH, USES SO THAT THERE IS A, JUST A BROADER RANGE. THE BUILDING IS, UH, CURRENTLY 50, ROUGHLY 53,000 SQUARE FEET AND THERE'S NO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE ITSELF. UM, JUST AMENDING THE, UH, PERMITTED USES. SO THE REQUEST IS TO ALLOW ALL THE USES THAT ARE WITHIN COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT AS DEFINED BY THE TABLE. UM, MEANING IF IT'S ALLOWED BY, BY RIGHT BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT ACCESSORY, UM, A TEMPORARY USE, ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES THAT, THAT WOULD CARRY OVER INTO THIS PLAN DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. THEN THEY WOULD ALSO LIKE TO INCLUDE SCHOOL VOCATIONAL OR TRADE AS A PERMITTED USE WITH THE DEFINITION INSIDE FROM THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AS WELL. AND, UH, CONTRACTOR'S OFFICE, UM, THOSE TWO ARE NOT TYPICALLY PERMITTED USES IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL, UM, UH, ZONING DISTRICT. SO THEY WANTED TO BE ABLE TO ADD THOSE. [00:50:01] UM, SO SINCE THE REQUEST IS FOR THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL EXCEPT FOR MEDICAL CLINIC, THE APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER HAVE, UH, REQUESTED TO ADD MEDICAL USES, BUT VERY SPECIFIC MEDICAL USES. UM, SO THEY'VE IDENTIFIED MEDICAL AND WELLNESS, UH, OVERALL, UH, CATEGORY AND THEN THEY'RE IN, THEY WOULD LIKE TO INCLUDE ALL OF THE LISTED ITEMS RANGING FROM DENTAL AND PHYSICAL THERAPY. UH, WE HAVE DERMATOLOGY, SLEEP, UH, MEDICATION OR SLEEP MEDICINE, UH, DOCTORS FOR, UH, SLEEP TESTS, UH, BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, UH, DIAGNOSTIC LABS AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH. AND THEN ALSO THE BEAUTY AND MED SPA SERVICES. AND THOSE ARE DEFINITIONS WERE PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT I CAN ALSO, UM, PULL THOSE UP AS WELL IF WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE ACTUAL DEFINITIONS OF THOSE. UH, IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UM, WITH THE TRYING TO GROW THE ECONOMIC BASE, UM, IF WE HAVE VACANCIES, WE'RE NOT, UM, ECONOMICALLY GROWING, SO, UM, IT HELPS MAINTAIN THE VITALITY, VITALITY OF THIS COMMERCIAL AREA AS WELL. UM, THE PLACE TYPE FOR THIS AREA IS URBAN VILLAGE AND THAT DOES, UH, PRIORITIZE CREATING SPACES WHERE IT IS PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY AND DENSE DEVELOPMENT. UM, AND THEN ON THE SPECTRUM OF CHANGE MAP, WE HAVE THAT IT IS READY FOR DEVELOPMENT SLASH REDEVELOPMENT. UM, AMENDING THE USES WOULD ACTUALLY HELP WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE BY HAVING, UH, MORE TENANTS IN IT. SO WE ARE, UM, REALLY, UH, USING THE SITE TO ITS BEST ABILITY AT THE MOMENT. AND, UH, COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADJACENT ZONING. SO YOU'LL SEE HERE THAT THE SITE ITSELF, UH, IS ZONED PD WITH THE AIRPORT ZONING ON THE, UH, WESTERN SIDE. AND THEN WE DO HAVE COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND, UM, MULTIFAMILY PDS AND, UH, AROUND THE OTHER SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. BUT THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES, UH, REALLY FIT INTO THIS AREA BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A LARGER SELECT, A LARGER VARIETY OF USES IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL THAT ARE ALSO IN THIS AREA. AND IT IS, UH, COMPLIANT WITH OUR ADJACENT USES. UH, THERE'S A MIX OF OFFICE SPACE, RETAIL, PERSONAL SERVICES, THE AIRPORT AND HANGERS, OTHER AERONAUTICAL RELATED USES, APARTMENTS AND CONDOS WITHIN THIS AREA. UH, SO IN HAVING ADDITIONAL USES THAT FALL WITHIN THAT COMMERCIAL GENERAL USE, UH, FITS IN WITH ALL OF THESE. UH, REALLY THE PERSONAL SERVICE KIND OF CAPTURES A LOT OF THINGS THAT COULD GO IN HERE AS WELL. WE DID NOTIFY PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN, UM, 200 FEET THAT WAS 102 PROPERTY OWNERS. UM, AND WE RECEIVED, UH, NO RESPONSE FROM THEM. UM, BUT WE DID SEND OUT ALL OF THAT AND STAFF HAS EVALUATED THE PROPOSAL AND UH, WE DO, UH, IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TOWN'S POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND THE OWNER IS HERE, UH, FOR QUESTIONS AS WELL. COREY, I HAVE SEVERAL QUESTIONS. , UM, AND MOST TO YOU, I'D ALSO LIKE TO DIRECT AT LEAST ONE TO THE APPLICANT, SO I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTOOD WHEN YOU SAID IT'S NOT A REZONE MM-HMM . WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? BECAUSE YOU'RE, YOU'RE CALLING IT A UNDER THE GL OR CG CLASSIFICATION, SO CLARIFY THAT IF YOU WOULD. YEP. UH, SO THE REQUEST IS TO ADD THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES TO THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT REZONING THE PROPERTY TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL. IS THAT A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE? I DON'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT MEANS. SO IF WE, IF THEY WERE, IF THE PROPERTY OWNER WERE TO REZONE THE PROPERTY, UM, THAT IT WOULD MORE THAN LIKELY BRING THE PROPERTY INTO NON-COMPLIANCE WITH MAJORITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITH, IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, FOR EXAMPLE, UM, THE REQUIRED PARKING, THE LANDSCAPE, UH, PERCENTAGES, UM, SIZE OF PARKING SPACES, ALL OF THOSE THINGS COME ALONG WITH THE, UM, THE BASE ZONING DISTRICT ITSELF. SO THEY'RE KEEPING THE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL AS IT IS IN THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, BUT THEY WANNA ADD MORE USES TO BE ABLE TO, UM, FILL THE VACANCIES WITHIN THE BUILDING. OKAY. I MEAN THAT, IT STRIKES ME AS A LITTLE DISINGENUOUS, JUST TO BE HONEST. UM, UPON RE IF THIS PROPERTY WERE TO BE SOLD, DOES THIS HAVE ANY, IS THERE ANY RAMIFICATIONS FROM GOING THIS ROUTE VERSUS REZONING? DO THEY HAVE TO DO ANYTHING WITH A SALE? UH, NOT TO [00:55:01] MY KNOWLEDGE. OKAY. UM, SO ONE OF THE THINGS YOU MENTIONED IS THE CG IS ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENCIES, BUT IF YOU GO BACK TO, TO THAT MAP, THE ONE YOU JUST HAD UP THERE, UH, PRIOR TO THIS ONE WITH THE APARTMENTS, THE USE, UH, THE USES, YEAH, THAT ONE RIGHT THERE, I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND THAT COMMENT BECAUSE YOU SEE APARTMENTS IN FRONT AND THEN BEHIND IT, IT, IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THERE ARE, IN FACT, THERE IS A CASE TO BE MADE TO, IF THIS WERE TO BE REZONED OR NOT REZONED, BUT THE CG APPLIED TO ACTUALLY HAVE THE CL APPLIED, WHICH IS A LITTLE MORE RESTRICTIVE. AND AS I READ IT, IT'S UM, EXPLICITLY DESIGNED TO SERVE SITE DESIGN USES AND SCALES CONSISTENT WITH ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS. SO I'M, I'M STRUGGLING WITH THAT, QUITE FRANKLY. UM, IS THIS UNDER THAT BUCKET OR, OR THIS BUCKET? SO HELP ME EDUCATE ME A LITTLE BIT AS TO WHY YOU, YOU GUYS FELT THE G THE CG WAS THE BETTER USE THAN HCL LESLIE I, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. UM, SO IF YOU LOOK, UM, TO THE, WHAT WOULD BE THE EAST OF THIS SITE, UH, IN RED CG, SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE OTHER AREA, THE OTHER PARCELS, UM, IN THE VICINITY, UM, THAT IS THE REFERENCE TO COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENCIES. UM, NOW I DON'T INHERENTLY HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH GOING, I'M GONNA SAY DOWN ZONING TO A COMMERCIAL LIMITED OR THE CL DISTRICT. UM, THAT'S SOMETHING I WOULD WANNA DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON THEIR THOUGHTS. UM, I KNOW THAT ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WAS DISCUSSED WHEN WE MET WITH THEM WAS THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL HAS, UM, WHAT'S CONSIDERED LOW IMPACT MAN, OR IT'S CALLED LOW IMPACT MANUFACTURING, IS ALLOWED BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL, AND IT'S NOT IN COMMERCIAL LIMITED. UM, THAT IS ONE THAT I IDENTIFIED THAT WOULD BE A POTENTIAL CONCERN BASED UPON PRIOR CONVERSATIONS. UM, HOWEVER, SINCE THIS IS A PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AS COREY MENTIONED, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE MODIFIED TO COMMERCIAL LIMITED, BUT BRINK CARRY FORWARD, UM, ALLOWING LOW IMPACT MANUFACTURING BY SPECIAL USE PERMIT. AND TO GIVE YOU, TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF SOMETHING THAT IS, COULD BE DEFINED AS LOW IMPACT MANUFACTURING, UM, UH, A UM, PLACE THAT CREATES OR MAKES, UM, LIKE APPAREL, LIKE NOT FAB, NOT, UH, FABRICATES, BUT LIKE SCREEN PRINTING THAT IS CONSIDERED LOW IMPACT MANUFACTURING. TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT WOULD FALL WITHIN THAT CATEGORY. SO YOU'RE SAYING IF WE DID THE CECL, WE COULD ADD THIS IS A PERMITTED USE MM-HMM . THE, THE REASON I BRING THIS UP IS WHEN I WENT THROUGH THE C DESIGNATION VERSUS THE CG, THERE'S ONLY 10 CATEGORIES THAT ARE DIFFERENT. UM, AND UH, SO IT DIDN'T FEEL TO ME LIKE IT WAS A DRACONIAN, UH, COMMENT. THE ONE AREA THAT'S PERMITTED, UH, UNDER THE CG IS, IS, UM, EVENT SPACE. AND THAT'S ONLY ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY TO A HOTEL. THANK YOU . OKAY. UH, DATA CENTERS IS ALLOWED AS A SPECIAL USE FUNCTION, SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SO THERE WERE CERTAIN THINGS IN HERE THAT CONCERNED ME. I DO, I DON'T WANT TO BE PENALIZING SOMEBODY WHO'S TRYING TO LEASE UP SPACE. I GET IT. UM, IT'S CHALLENGING TIMES AND I WANNA SUPPORT THAT. I FELT THAT THE CL DESIGNATION GAVE THEM 90% OF WHAT THEY WANTED WITHOUT QUITE OPENING UP THE DOORS. SO LESLIE, YOU'VE ANSWERED PROBABLY MY SINGLE BIGGEST CONCERN WAS EVENT, EVENT SPACE BECAUSE IF, AS YOU KNOW, IN THIS TOWN WE'VE HAD A HISTORY OF HAVING EVENT SPACES MORPH INTO THINGS THAT MAYBE WE, WE WISH WE HADN'T HAD TO DEAL WITH. SO, UM, I'M FINE. I THINK I'M FINE WITH THIS, THE CG GIVEN THAT, UM, I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION AND THAT RELATES TO THE NEED FOR THE MEDICAL WELLNESS BEING BY, RIGHT? BECAUSE IT SEEMS TO ME IF YOU READ THE DESIGNATION THAT THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED UNDER THE CG IT'S PRETTY BROAD FOR MEDICAL. SO CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR ME WHY THAT WOULD BE CALLED OUT AS, UH, BY RIGHT AND NOT PART OF THE GENERAL CG UM, LANGUAGE? SO IF YOU LOOK UNDER MEDICAL CLINIC, THE DEFINITION, IT SEEMS TO PARALLEL MOST OF THAT THAT'S UP THERE. SO, UM, YEAH, I THINK THERE ARE, UM, AFTER DISCUSSING WITH THE APPLICANT, UM, THERE COULD BE SOME USES THAT, UM, DON'T EXPLICITLY FALL WITHIN THESE, UM, THAT COULD CAUSE CONCERN BASED UPON PRIOR DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY COUNCIL. UM, SO BEING PROACTIVE TO [01:00:01] IDENTIFY THINGS THAT THEY HAVE, UM, RECEIVED INQUIRIES ABOUT IN THE PAST. UM, ESSENTIALLY JUST PREPARING IN ADVANCE OF WHAT, WHAT THEY ARE LOOKING FOR. UM, THAT WAS, THAT WAS THE INTENT. IT, IT FEELS LIKE A BELT SUSPENDER KIND OF THING, BUT THAT'S A, THAT'S FINE. YEAH, THIS, THIS STAFF DID NOT, UM, STAFF DID, UH, REVIEW UH, THIS LIST AND, AND LIKE I SAID, COLLABORATED WITH THE APPLICANT. UH, BUT THE APPLICANT CREATED THIS LIST BASED UPON THEIR EXPERIENCE. THANK YOU. ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS COMMISSIONERS? NO. OKAY. THANKS. COREY. IS THE APPLICANT HERE AND WISH TO SPEAK? I'M HERE. DO ANY OF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I JUST, I DO HAVE A GENERAL QUESTION. HOLD ON. YES, THEN PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE FOR THE RECORD. SURE. I, SUSANNA DRYDEN JENSEN. MY UH, ADDRESS IN ADDISON IS 4 8 4 9 KELLER SPRINGS. THANK YOU. UM, YOU MENTIONED IN THE, IN THE OR IT WAS MENTIONED IN THE WRITEUP THAT YOU'RE, UH, STRUGGLING WITH SOME OF THE LEASE UP BECAUSE OF VARIOUS RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE ON YOU. HAVE YOU COME TO COUNSEL OR P AND Z IN THE PAST AND ASKED FOR ANY EXEMPTIONS OR ANY, ANY CONSIDERATION IN TERMS OF LEASING OF THE SPACE? UH, WE HAVE NOT COME TO COUNCIL. UH, WE'VE SPOKEN WITH, UM, THE CITY AND UM, COME FOR SPECIFIC, WELL NOT SPECIFIC USE PERMITS, BUT ASKED WOULD THIS USE BE ALLOWED OR NOT, UM, YOU KNOW, AND THAT SORT OF GRAY AREA TYPE OF USE. UM, SO WE'VE DONE THAT BUT WE HAVEN'T COME THIS FAR YET. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN UP FOR COREY. DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANT? OKAY, AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN THIS UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ITEM. DOES ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN REGARDS TO THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME TO PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS ANYONE ONLINE. OKAY. HAVING SEEN NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. IS THERE ANY FURTHER IN DISCUSSION FROM COMMISSIONERS? OKAY, WITH HAVING SEEN NONE? DO I HAVE A MOTION MOVE APPROVAL OF THE PD AMENDMENT FOR CASE 1967 DASH Z GATEWAY CENTER. I SECOND. I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? HAVING SEEN NONE. MOTION CARRIES. CONGRATS. NEXT ITEM ON GENERAL ITEM G HAS BEEN POSTPONED. DO I NEED TO READ THE WHOLE THING, LESLIE? UH, WE NEED TO UH, CONSIDER F OH NO, DIDN'T WE JUST DO, OH NO, SORRY, I CROSSED IT OFF. SORRY. JUMPED AHEAD HERE. HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING. SORRY. [f. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on a request to amend the permitted use and development standards for Planned Development, Ordinance No. O85-006, for a 3.22± acre property generally located north of Keller Springs Road and east of Addison Road, and addressed as 4851 Keller Springs Road. Case 1962-Z/4851 Keller Springs Road PD Amendment.] WE'RE GONNA DO IT. ITEM F HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING PRESENT, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON A REQUEST TO AMEND THE PERMITTED USE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. NUMBER 0 85 DASH ZERO SIX FOR APPROXIMATELY 3.22 ACRES. PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH OF KELLER SPRINGS ROAD AND EAST OF ADDISON ROAD AND ADDRESSED AS 48 51 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD CASE, 1962 DASH Z SLASH 48 51 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD, PD AMENDMENT. COREY, I'LL TURN IT OVER FOR STAFF REPORT. UH, COREY, BE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. I HAVE BEFORE YOU A PLAN DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, UM, FOR, UH, THE PROPERTY AT 48 50 COLOR SPRINGS ROAD. UM, WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT MAJORITY OF THE PD ITSELF, BUT I'LL GO BACK THROUGH THAT. SO PRIOR TO 1985, THE PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY ZONED, UH, COMMERCIAL, WHICH ALLOWED TYPICAL COMMERCIAL USES. THEN IN 1985, THE PROPERTY WAS REZONED TO A COMMER TO A PD, WHICH ESTABLISHED OFFICE, SHOWROOM, WAREHOUSE AND RESTAURANT AS THE, UH, PERMITTED USES. AND IT ESTABLISHED THE INITIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS. AND TONIGHT WE HAVE A PD AMENDMENT TO ALLOW A BROADER RANGE OF USES. UH, LIKE I MENTIONED, THE CURRENT PERMITTED USES ARE OFFICE, WAREHOUSE, SHOWROOM, AND RESTAURANT. ALL OF THOSE THINGS DO HAVE VERY SPECIFIC SQUARE FOOTAGES ACROSS THE ENTIRE PD. AND THIS, UH, BUILDING FOR THE PD IS ROUGHLY 54,000 SQUARE FEET. THERE ARE NO SITE DIFFERENT. UM, PER SITE MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED. UM, THEY'RE SIMPLY REQUESTING TO ADD ADDITIONAL USES, UM, FROM THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL, UH, ZONING DISTRICT TO THEIR PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AND ALL OF THOSE WOULD BE AS DEFINED IN THE TABLE OF USES IN ARTICLE TWO, 4.2 0.7. THE SITE, THIS RE THIS REQUEST IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THIS SITE IS, UH, A PLACE TYPE OF URBAN VILLAGE, WHICH REALLY TRIES TO ESTABLISH A BUSTLING HUB THAT [01:05:01] HAS, UH, PRIORITIZES PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENTS. AND IT IS WITHIN THE DEVELOP REDEVELOP, UM, SPECTRUM OF CHANGE AREA. THE REQUESTED AMENDMENT DOES, UH, HELP WITH THAT REDEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE BY, UH, UM, INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF TENANTS THAT ARE IN THE BUILDING. THE ZONING FOR THIS AREA, UM, IS SURROUNDED BY PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL. UM, AND IT, THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES FITS WITHIN THE ADJACENT, UH, ZONING DISTRICTS SINCE THERE ARE OTHER COMMERCIAL GENERAL IN THE AREA, AS WELL AS YOU DO HAVE ADDISON AIRPORT ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE AREA. UM, SO HIGHER INTENSITY NEXT TO THAT IS, UM, IS, IS IN COMPLIANCE. UH, IT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AND HA THE MIX OF USES INCLUDES OFFICE, RETAIL, PERSONAL SERVICES, AIRPORT HANGAR, OTHER AERONAUTICAL RELATED USES, APARTMENTS AND CONDOMINIUM. SO, UM, HAVING OTHER COMMERCIAL GENERAL AND JUST REGULAR COMMERCIAL USES IN GENERAL. IN THE AREA, UM, DOES, UM, IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH EVERYTHING. WE DID NOTICE FOR THIS PROPERTY WITH EVERYONE WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT WAS 101 NOTICES AND WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY, UH, RE UH, RESPONSE STAFF DID REVIEW THE PROPOSAL AND IT DOES COMPLY WITH ADOPTED POLICIES AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. OH. UM, AND THE PROPERTY OWNER IS HERE IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THEM, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS TOO. DO YOU HAVE THE LIST FROM THE ZONING, THE CODE THAT YOU JUST QUOTED OF COMMERCIAL GENERALIST 4.1? DO YOU, CAN YOU PULL THAT UP? I DON'T HAVE IT PULLED UP IN HERE, BUT I, I WAS TRYING TO GET TO WHAT WE'RE ALLOWING AT THIS ONE THAT WE BASICALLY DID IN THE OTHER MEDICAL USE BASICALLY. YEAH. SO, UM, OH, WHERE'D YOU GUYS GET THIS? DID YOU SOMEBODY JUST PRINT IT. OKAY. I WAS LIKE, DID THEY NOT HAND THIS TO ME? UM, SO IS THAT MAINLY WHAT WE'RE, WHAT WERE THE GETTING THAT THE OTHER ONE DIDN'T ASK FOR IS, OR IS IT A LOT A WHOLE LIST OF NO, UM, SO THE, THIS APPLICANT IS REQUESTING COMMERCIAL GENERAL, UM, IN GENERAL FOR USES TO BE ADDED. THE OTHER ONE SAID, UH, COMMERCIAL GENERAL MINUS MEDICAL, UH, CLINIC AND THEN ADDED THEIR OWN, UM, LIST FOR THAT AS WELL AS THE TRADE SCHOOL AND CONTRACTOR OFFICE. OKAY. SO BACK TO MY ORIGINAL QUESTION, THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN, BASICALLY THIS GETS US MED GETS THEM MEDICAL USE. OKAY, THANK YOU. NEXT QUESTION. IS THIS ONE UP TO CODE FOR PARKING AND NO COMPLIANCE ISSUES THAT THEY, UH, SO IT WOULD BE THE SAME THING FOR THEM. UH, THIS BUILDING WAS BUILT AROUND THE SAME TIME AS THE OTHER ONE, UH, UNDER THE SAME PD AND DEVELOPMENT PLANS. UM, SO WE'RE AMENDING A PD NOT CHANGING THE ZONING, CORRECT? MM-HMM . I'M FOLLOWING. OKAY. WE'RE JUST CHANGING TECHNICAL TERMS, ADDING UC. GOT IT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, I DO. CAN YOU GO BACK TO THE I THIS SAYS YOU'RE PROPOSING TO ZONE AT COMMERCIAL GENERAL NOT CHANGING THE PD. IS THAT, IS THE PD AMENDMENT TO ADD COMMERCIAL GENERAL USES TO THE, UH, PD. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM COMMISSIONERS? OKAY. WOULD THE APPLICANT LIKE TO COME AND SPEAK OR DO COMMISSIONERS HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? YOU HAVE QUESTION? YES. DO YOU GUYS HAVE QUESTIONS? NO, MA'AM. OKAY, NEVERMIND. OKAY. I WILL AT THIS TIME OPEN UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING. ANYBODY WISH TO COME SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE OR ITEM OR ANYONE ONLINE? OKAY. HAVING SEEN NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC PORTION OF THE HEARING. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS FROM STAFF OR, OR SORRY, BEFORE STAFF OR ANYBODY? YOU GUYS GOOD? MM-HMM. OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION? SURE. I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE APPROVAL ON CASE 1962 DASH C SLASH 4 85 1 KELLER SPRINGS ROAD PD AMENDMENT AS WRITTEN. DO I HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? OKAY, ITEM CARRIES. CONGRATULATIONS. ITEM G IS POSTPONED. DO I NEED TO READ THIS WHOLE THING? SORRY. OKAY. SO ITEM G'S BEEN POSTPONED AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO [h. Hold a public hearing, present, discuss, and consider action on the adoption of a new zoning district for a Public Park Overlay and amendments to the text of the Unified Development Code (“UDC”) , including changes to the Town of Addison’s laws and regulations regarding zoning districts, subdivision and development, and building and construction.] ITEM H. HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING PRESENT AND DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON THE ADOPTION OF A NEW ZONING DISTRICT FOR PARK OVERLAY AND AMENDMENTS TO THE TEXT OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE UDC, INCLUDING CHANGES TO THE TOWN'S LAWS AND REGULATIONS REGARDING ZONING, DISTRICT SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION. UH, TURN IT OVER TO JADE. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION, JADE, BROAD MAX COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING MANAGER. UM, YOU HAVE SEEN THIS DISCUSSION BEFORE, LARGELY IN A COUPLE OF WORK SESSIONS, BUT THE PURPOSE IS TO AMEND THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH WAS, UM, [01:10:02] ADOPTED IN MARCH OF 2025 AFTER GOING THROUGH A SIX OR SEVEN YEAR PROCESS TO, UM, CONSOLIDATE, UM, SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS THAT EXISTED IN THE TOWN'S CODE OF ORDINANCES INTO ONE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. AND SO SINCE IT'S BEEN ADOPTED AND WAS EFFECTIVE AS OF SEPTEMBER 1ST OF LAST YEAR, THERE ARE SOME AMENDMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PROPOSED THAT ARE, UM, LARGELY CLARIFICATIONS TO LAND USES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS. BUT THEN ALSO WE HAVE COUNCIL DIRECTED, UM, AMENDMENTS IN HERE, THE LARGEST BEING THE NEW ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH IS AN OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT SEPARATE FROM THE BASE ZONING, WHICH, UM, THE INTENDED PURPOSE BEHIND THAT WAS TO CREATE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS FOR OUR EXISTING PARKS. UM, IN THE EVENT THAT NEW USES, UM, RELATIVE TO PARK DEVELOPMENT ARE PROPOSED, THAT THOSE ARE IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE VISION FOR HOW THE PARKS SHOULD DEVELOP, WHICH IS PREDOMINANTLY LIMITED TO PARKS AND RECREATION USES. SO I'LL GO INTO A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL ON THAT. UM, BUT BRIEF BACKGROUND ON THE DISCUSSIONS THAT WE'VE HAD ALREADY ON THIS, WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF WORK SESSIONS WITH EACH GROUP. SO PNC RATED DID TWO AND IN AUGUST AND THEN, OR EXCUSE ME, UM, DID TWO ROUNDS OF WORK SESSIONS WITH PNC AND COUNCIL. SO IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER, UM, THOSE WERE AVAILABLE FOR VIEWING IF ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE IS INTERESTED IN THE DIALOGUE THAT HAPPENED THERE. BUT THAT BRINGS US TO TODAY WHERE WE ARE AT THE ADOPTION HEARING. SO I WILL GO OVER, UM, BRIEFLY JUST A SUMMARY OF CHANGES BECAUSE IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED BEFORE. UM, WE'RE CARRYING FORWARD EVERYTHING THAT YOU HAVE SEEN ALREADY. THERE'S A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT CHANGES THAT ARE INTEGRATED. BUT FOR, UM, THE SAKE OF, AGAIN, THE AUDIENCE WHO'S INTERESTED OR THE RECORDING, WE HAVE A SUMMARY OF FEEDBACK HERE. SO FROM THE, THE COMMISSION WE HAD, UM, SOME DIRECTION TO KIND OF WALK BACK RESTRICTIONS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED ON HOOKAH. SO IF YOU RECALL, WE DID PROPOSE BASED ON COUNCIL DIRECTION, A TOTAL BAN, UM, ON HOOKAH, BUT THAT HAS BEEN WALKED BACK SO WE'LL PRESENT THAT. BUT ESSENTIALLY, UM, FOR HOOKAH AND CIGAR LOUNGES, WE'VE MIRRORED THOSE STANDARDS TO MATCH EACH OTHER AND, UM, APPLY ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS SO THAT THERE'S MORE FILTRATION AND OVERSIGHT OVER THE FILTRATION WITH THE NEW, UM, PERMIT PROCEDURE THAT WOULD BE OVERSEEN BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AS WELL AS OPERATIONS THAT WOULD HAVE TO CEASE BY 11:00 PM WE ALSO PROPOSED BASED ON YOUR FEEDBACK PARKING REDUCTIONS. SO THIS IS MEANT TO, UM, CAPITALIZE ON FUTURE TOD DEVELOPMENT. AND SO WE, UM, PROPOSED A BOUNDARY WHICH MIRRORS A LOT OF THE ADDISON CIRCLE DISTRICT THAT DOES ALLOW USERS TO APPLY FOR A, UM, PARKING REDUCTION WITHIN THAT BOUNDARY OF ESSENTIALLY ADDISON CIRCLE TO ENCOURAGE WALKING AND A MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY ENVIRONMENT. UM, WE HAVE CLARIFIED A COUPLE REFERENCES FOR TREE REQUIREMENTS SINCE YOU LOST, UM, SAW ME AND THEN BRIEFLY, CITY COUNCIL AGAIN, THEY PROPOSED THAT WE CREATE THE PARK OVERLAY, BUT UM, ALSO AGREED TO SIMPLIFY SOME OF THE STANDARDS A LITTLE BIT. AND THEN, UM, WE HAD SOME OTHER, UM, CHANGES DIRECTED FROM STAFF JUST TO RESTORE SOME HISTORIC RECORDS WITH THE APPENDIX AS WELL AS CLARIFY NEW DISTINCT LAND USES, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. SO AGAIN, A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE SEQUENCE. I'VE KIND OF TOUCHED ON THIS ALREADY, BUT WE HAD SEVERAL WORK SESSIONS. WE DID MAIL NOTICE TO EVERY PROPERTY OWNER IN THE TOWN. UM, I HAVE RECEIVED ONE COMMENT RELATIVE TO THAT. AND THEN WE AFTER TODAY WILL BE HEADED TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR ADOPTION HEARING ON NOVEMBER 10TH. SO ONLY A COUPLE OF NEW CHANGES SINCE, UM, THE SEPTEMBER WORK SESSION WHERE WE DISCUSSED IT, THE DISC DISCUSSED, BUT IT'S NOT DISGUSTED, UM, HOOKAH BARS. SO WE HAVE RESTRICTED THOSE TO TWO DISTRICTS RATHER THAN, UM, THE BROADER PROPOSAL. UM, AGAIN, TRYING TO FIND A HAPPY MEDIUM BETWEEN COUNCIL'S TOTAL BAN AND THE MORE PER PERMISSIVE REQUIREMENT OR PERMISSIVE STANDARD THAT WAS PROPOSED. SO WE HAVE, UM, DROPPED THAT DOWN TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICTS BASED ON FEEDBACK. AND FOR HOOKAH AND CIGAR OPERATIONS. WE DID CODIFY THE CHANGE TO STOP THOSE OPERATIONS FOR ONSITE SMOKING, UM, AT 11, AND THEY CANNOT DO THAT EVEN WITH A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. SO IT'S JUST PROHIBITED. [01:15:01] UM, NEXT MAJOR SECTION OF THE AMENDMENTS IS AGAIN THE PARK OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT. SO, UM, IT'S MEANT TO ONCE CODIFIED LOOK LIKE THIS ON THE ZONING MAP, SO IT'LL HAVE A GREEN HATCH OVER OUR EXISTING PARKS THAT WILL IDENTIFY FOR, UM, USERS OR APPLICANTS, WHOEVER, UM, MAY PROPOSE A NEW TYPE OF USE, UM, RELATIVE TO THE PARKS, THAT THERE ARE ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS THERE. AND WHAT THE PARK OVERLAY DISTRICT DOES, UM, IS IT HAS PERMITTED USES RELATIVE TO THAT OVERLAY DISTRICT ONLY. SO IT IS JUST PARKER OPEN SPACE, ACTIVE OR PASSIVE ACTIVE BEING LIKE A SPORT COURT, PASSIVE BEING LIKE A TRAIL AND THEN RECREATION FACILITY, INDOOR OR OUTDOOR. SO LIKE THE ATHLETIC CLUB OR A TENNIS COURT TYPE OF DEAL. UM, AND SO IF SOMEBODY IS PROPOSING A USE THAT IS NOT THOSE USES, THEY HAVE TO GET A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, WHICH REQUIRES PUBLIC HEARINGS AT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. SO AGAIN, CODIFYING THE DIRECTION RECEIVED, UM, BASED ON WORK SESSIONS WITH YOURSELVES AND COUNSEL. UM, DO WANNA EMPHASIZE AGAIN THAT WE HAVE THESE VERY SPECIFICALLY DEFINED SO IT'S NOT, UM, GOING TO BE A GRAY AREA FOR WHAT WOULD, UM, QUALIFY FOR THOSE USES. ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF THAT, THOSE FOUR THERE WOULD REQUIRE AN SUP. UM, I CAN PAUSE THERE IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS. THE REST OF THIS IS WHAT YOU'VE SEEN BEFORE. NO QUESTIONS. OKAY. OH, QUESTION. SURE. SO, UM, I HAD ASKED EARLIER FROM STAFF A CLARIFICATION ON, UM, I WANT PICK THE BUILDING JOB IN HOPS BECAUSE IT'S GOT A COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE IN IT AND I WOULD JUST LIKE IT CLEAR THAT THAT IS OPERATING UNDER AN S AS A UNDER AN SUP. IS THAT CORRECT? YEP. YEP. AND THAT ANY PROPOSED CHANGE TO MODIFY THAT SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE UNDERLYING BASE DISTRICT WOULD STILL REQUIRE A NEW SUP YEP. A ZONING AND COUNSEL APPROVAL, CORRECT? YEP. THE SAME WOULD HOLD TRUE IF WE WANTED TO BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING MM-HMM . UH, LET'S SAY A CONCERT WE WANTED TO CHANGE OUR CONCERT STAGE AND BUILD IT IN AND ALL OF THAT. WOULD THAT ALSO BE SUBJECT TO THE SAME OR WOULD THAT BE, UM, UNDER THE LANGUAGE IN AT THE DIRECTOR'S ESSENTIALLY RECOMMENDATION OR APPROVAL? THAT'S THE REALLY THE LANGUAGE IN THE, IN THE, IN THE, THE UDC THAT I'M A LITTLE WORRIED ABOUT IS THAT IT'S VERY BROAD IN TERMS OF THE DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO, UM, TO THE DIRECTOR AS TO WHAT COULD BE DONE. SURE. UM, DID YOU WANNA SPEAK TO IT? YEAH, I CAN. UM, LESLIE AND I, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, UM, SO THE, WHAT IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED LIMITS LAND USE, SO THAT IS THE DISTINCTION. SO IF IT IS A, A PAVILION THAT IS INTENDED TO BE PASSIVE, LET'S JUST SAY IT'S A, A SHADE STRUCTURE, I'LL USE THAT TERM, IT'S A LITTLE BIT BETTER. UM, AND MAYBE THERE'S GONNA BE A PICNIC TABLE UNDER IT OR CHAIRS THAT WOULD LIKELY FALL UNDER I, IT WOULD FALL IF YOU LOOK, READ THE DEFINITION UNDER, UM, PASSIVE PARK OR OPEN SPACE. SO THAT IN ITSELF WOULD NOT TRIGGER A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. UM, AND I, SO WHAT YOU HAD MENTIONED OF A LARGER PAVILION THAT SOMEONE COULD, YOU KNOW, PLAY AN INSTRUMENT UNDER THAT WOULD LIKELY FALL UNDER, UM, ACTIVE AS WELL. UM, OR ONE OF THE RECREATION, UM, IF YOU READ THOSE AMPHITHEATER IS UNDER OUTDOOR OUTDOOR ARENA, YOU KNOW, SO THAT'S, BUT WE'RE SO, SO JUST, I JUST WANNA MAKE THAT DISTINCTION. BUT THEN WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT, UM, MAJOR PROJECTS, SO CAPITAL PROJECTS, AND WE'RE GETTING A LITTLE, A LITTLE ON THE FRINGE OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SCOPE. SO ANYTHING OVER, UM, $50,000 REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL, WHICH IS OUTSIDE OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UM, OR THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, EXCUSE ME. AND THEN, SO THERE ARE ADDITIONAL STOPGAP MEASURES, IF YOU WILL, UM, THAT ARE OUT THAT LIVE OUTSIDE OF THIS. I JUST WANNA MAKE THOSE DISTINCTIONS OF WHAT THIS IS. RIGHT. BUT THEY WOULD BYPASS THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD BECAUSE THEY WOULD, THE SUP WOULD BE APPROVED AND EVALUATED BY THE DIRECTOR, AND P AND Z WOULD NOT HAVE A ROLE IN THAT, IN THAT EVALUATION THEN. SO WE, SO THE, THE DIRECTOR WOULD NEVER [01:20:01] EVALUATE AN, A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, OR THAT'S NOT THE INTENT. IF IT'S, IF IT'S NOT WORDED VERY CLEARLY, WE SHOULD, WE NEED TO CORRECT THAT. I THINK WHAT IS IS SAYING IS THAT THE DIRECTOR WILL EVALUATE IF IT MEETS IF IT FALLS WITHIN ONE OF THESE FOUR CATEGORIES. AND IF IT DOES NOT, IT GENERALLY WILL REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE, IT WILL REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ONLY IF IT IS ALLOWED TO, TO BE REQUESTED TO DO SO UNDER THE BASE DISTRICT. OKAY. SO THE, THE LANGUAGE IS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL SHALL BE EVALUATED BY THE DIRECTOR BASED UPON THE GOALS OF THE PARK RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE MASTER PLANNING, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PARK FUNCTIONS AND PARK. SO, SO WE WOULD NO, SO P AND Z WOULD NO LONGER BE INVOLVED IN THAT APPROVAL, IS THAT CORRECT? NO, THAT IS NOT, THAT IS NOT THE INTENT. I THINK THE INTENT IS, IS THOSE ARE THE CRITERIA THAT STAFF WILL EVALUATE THE PROPOSAL, BUT A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IS ZONING ACTION AND WILL ALWAYS REQUIRE CONSIDERATION AND A RECOMMENDATION BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND APPROVAL OR DENIAL ACTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL. SO IT IS IN NO WAY OUR INTENT TO BYPASS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISS. SO, SO I THINK WE JUST NEED, COUNCIL WILL ALWAYS HAVE A SAY, I GET THAT. AND IT'S, AND NOT TO BYPASS P AND Z EITHER. SO MAYBE WE JUST NEED TO CLARIFY THE LANGUAGE A LITTLE BIT. YEAH. SO I'D, I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT TO, AND AGAIN, I HAD PROPOSED LAST TIME THAT THERE WAS A DOLLAR CAP. THAT MAY NOT BE THE BEST WAY OF DOING IT, BUT WHERE ANY LARGE, UH, FOOTPRINT HAS CHANGED OR THOSE KINDS OF THINGS ARE CHANGED, UH, THAT ARE MAJOR, UM, THAT, THAT SPECIAL REPU FOLLOW IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2 5 1, WHICH I THINK IS WHAT YOU, YOU FED BACK TO ME. SO I'M JUST WORRIED ABOUT THAT LANGUAGE A LITTLE BIT. I'D LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GO THROUGH P AND Z ON ANY LARGE FOOTPRINT CHANGES OR THAT KIND OF THING. YEAH, I THINK ON THE, WHAT YOU, WHAT YOU JUST READ ABOUT THE SUP APPROVAL, I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE CHANGED TO LIKE AN EVA EVALUATION, NOT APPROVAL. 'CAUSE THE STAFF DOES NOT APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMITS. RIGHT? YEAH. THAT'S IT. THAT, THAT'S MY ONLY, SO, AND I ASSUME YOU CAN DO THAT WITH OUR CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BEFORE IT GOES TO COUNCIL. I DON'T WANNA HOLD THIS UP. I JUST, I, I JUST LIKE THAT LANGUAGE TIGHTENED UP A LITTLE. THANK YOU. YEAH, WE CAN ADD A, LIKE A REFERENCE TO THAT SECTION THAT SPECIFIES CPS GO THROUGH P AND Z AND COUNCIL, SO THAT'S EASY. OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH, JADE. UM, A A LIGHT BULB KIND OF WENT OFF MY HEAD WHILE, WHILE ALAN WAS KIND OF GOING THROUGH THAT. SO I SEE HERE IT SAYS LIMITED RETAIL AND CONCESSIONS. UM, I GUESS BEFORE I, I'M GONNA ASK MY DUMB QUESTION FIRST. DOES THAT MEAN LIKE DUTCH BROS COULD BE LIKE, HEY, WE WANNA REPLACE JAVA AND HOPS AND BUILD A DRIVE THROUGH COFFEE PLACE IN ADDISON CIRCLE PARK, AND WOULD THAT, IS THAT A BLANKET? NO. OR DOES THAT GO TO SUP? LIKE WHAT'S, WHAT'S THE LINE? SORRY. THOSE ARE ONLY ALLOWED AS ACCESSORY USES. SO IT WOULD HAVE TO BE ACCESSORY TO A PRIMARY USE. UM, AND EVEN THEN, UM, IT WOULD, IT WOULD REALLY DEPEND UPON THE SCOPE. UM, BUT TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, A DRIVE THROUGH WOULD NEVER BE PERMITTED. THAT DOESN'T FIT THE DEFINITION OF A, LIKE A CONCESSION. THIS IS LIKE, OKAY, THIS IS, FOR EXAMPLE, MAYBE THERE IS A SMALL COFFEE BAR, WHICH THERE KIND OF IS A DEFACTO COFFEE BAR INSIDE THE ATHLETIC CLUB. OR MAYBE THE ATHLETIC CLUB STARTS SELLING WATER AND GATORADE AND IT'S NOT IN A VENDING MACHINE. OKAY. THAT WOULD BE ACCESSORY TO A REC FACILITY, NOT A SEPARATE BUSINESS WITH A SEPARATE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY OPERATING AN INDEPENDENT BUSINESS THAT HAS HAPPENS TO BE ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN THE SAME VICINITY AS A PARK. OKAY. OKAY. UM, SO WE WOULD TREAT IT AS WE TREAT ALL OTHER ACCESSORY USES THAT IT, IS IT OPERATING INDEPENDENTLY? UM, IS IT OPERATED BY THE SAME OPERATOR? THESE ARE ALL QUESTIONS THAT WE ASK TO CONSIDER. IS IT ACCESSORY OR IS IT INHERENTLY A PART OF THE, YOU KNOW, THE CORE OR IS IT OPERATING TRULY AS AN ACCESSORY USE OR IS IT A SECOND PRIMARY USE? MM-HMM . OKAY. YEAH. AND I CAN KIND OF SEE THE DIFFERENCE IN HOW JAVA AND HOPS WOULD BE COMPARED TO A DUTCH BROS, WHICH SHOULD BE OBVIOUS. BUT I THINK, UH, HAVING THAT CLARIFICATION IS HELPFUL FOR ME AS WELL. NICE. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS FROM MICHELLE? I JUST WANNA MAKE, YEAH, SO I THINK THAT'S IN, IN REGARD TO MY COMMENT. THAT'S WHY MAKING SURE IT GOES THROUGH P AND Z, YOU HAVE THAT STOP WHERE IF ANYTHING LIKE THAT COMES UP, YOU DON'T NEED TO WORRY ABOUT IT. 'CAUSE IT'LL BE THROUGH PUBLIC CERTAINLY. YEAH. AND SO I SECOND HIS, HIS, HIS THOUGHTS ON ASKING FOR CLARITY IN THE LANGUAGE THERE. OKAY. PERFECT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? THANKS, JANE. YEAH, I WILL KEEP GOING. YOU KEEP GOING. SORRY, YOU JUST STOPPED. OKAY. YES, I DO HAVE TO GET THROUGH THE REST, BUT I'LL TRY AND BREEZE THROUGH IT BECAUSE, UM, WE HAVE PRESENTED IT IDENTICALLY BEFORE. UM, BUT WE HAVE SEVERAL AMENDMENTS THAT ARE LARGELY MINOR CLARIFICATIONS. [01:25:01] ALL OF THIS IS, UM, VIEWABLE IN THE PACKET IN A RED LINE DOCUMENT. SO YOU CAN SEE CLEARLY THE CHANGES THAT CORRESPOND DIRECTLY TO, UM, THIS PRESENTATION. BUT, UM, ARTICLE ONE MINOR EDITS TO CLARIFY, UM, NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE TWO IS, UM, ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES. SO LIKE WE WERE MENTIONING THE PROCESS FOR AN SUP, UM, THOSE STANDARDS ARE LISTED IN ARTICLE TWO, SO THINGS THAT DICTATE WHEN APPROVALS GO THROUGH AND WHERE WE HAD SOME MINOR AMENDMENTS TO THIS, UM, JUST FOR, UM, ADMINISTRATIVE EASE. SO AN EXAMPLE OF THAT WOULD BE THE FIRST ONE THERE THAT SPECIFIES IF AN APPLICANT IS COMING THROUGH PNZ, THEY NEED TO GO TO COUNCIL WITHIN 60 DAYS. UM, THERE'S SEVERAL MINOR EDITS LIKE THAT TO KEEP THE PROCESS MOVING QUICKLY AND SMOOTHLY. UM, I'LL MENTION ONE OTHER IN HERE. UM, WE DID INCLUDE LANGUAGE FOR, UM, STATE LAW THAT REQUIRED CHANGES TO NOTICE. SO THAT IS RELEVANT TO TODAY BECAUSE WE USED THAT SECTION, UM, TO NOTIFY FOR THE HOOKAH, UM, AND CIGAR LOUNGES MORE. ARTICLE TWO, UM, A COUPLE I'LL PULL FROM HERE. WE HAD A LOT OF THINGS RELATIVE TO TREES AND MEASUREMENTS. UM, SO THIS IS BASED ON, UM, REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS WITH OUR, UM, PARKS PROJECT MANAGER WHERE THERE'S A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN AN INDUSTRY STANDARD AND HOW YOU MEASURE CALIBER INCHES FOR TREES FOR MITIGATION PURPOSES. AND SO WE'VE UPDATED A LOT OF THOSE THINGS. UM, ARTICLE THREE IS LARGELY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, SO THINGS LIKE THE LINEAR DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINES FOR SETBACKS AND UM, THINGS LIKE THAT. AND SO WE HAD SOME MINOR EDITS TO THIS, JUST PULLING A COUPLE FROM HERE. UM, UM, THE, LET'S SEE, THE FIRST ONE THERE, IMPERVIOUS COVER. SO THAT'S A SUSTAINABILITY STANDARD THAT'S MEANT TO MANAGE RUNOFF. UM, AND SO WE HAD SOME QUESTIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ABOUT HOW THAT IS MEASURED. AND SO ADDED A CLARIFICATION THAT WE DO MEASURE THAT PER AN ENTIRE SITE, NOT IN AN INDIVIDUAL LOCKED. UM, SO MINOR THINGS LIKE THAT. UM, ARTICLE FOUR IS LARGELY, UM, USES IN ZONING. SO THIS IS A HEAVY HITTER IN TERMS OF JUST DAILY ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. BUT 4, 2 7 IS THE ALLOWED USES. SO IT MAY LOOK LIKE A SMALL RED LINE, YOU'LL SEE MAYBE A SCO TO A P, BUT IT HAS PRETTY SIGNIFICANT, UM, IMPLICATIONS WHEN THOSE CHANGES ARE MADE. UM, IT'LL CHANGE THE PROCESS FOR APPROVAL AND THE TIMELINE FOR APPLICANTS. SO WE MADE SEVERAL, UM, UPDATES TO THAT. THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ARE GONNA BE THE SMOKING FACILITIES, WHICH WE'VE DISCUSSED ALREADY. UM, OOPS. SO WE HAD SEVERAL UPDATES TO THIS. UM, NEW USES THAT HAVE BEEN, UM, REQUESTED FROM APPLICANTS THAT WE REALIZED DID NOT HAVE A, A SPECIFIC ENOUGH DEFINITION. AND SO WE'VE ADDED THOSE USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS IN ARTICLE FOUR AS WELL TO ADD ADDITIONAL PROTECTIONS. AN EXAMPLE OF THIS WOULD BE, UM, PET CARE COMMERCIAL. SO THIS IS RELEVANT TO TONIGHT'S AGENDA WHERE WE DIDN'T HAVE A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIKE KENNELING AND OVERNIGHT VERSUS LIKE RETAIL SALES OF, UM, PETS. AND SO WE'VE ADDED THAT DISTINCTION AS A USE. UM, SOME MORE MINOR AMENDMENTS THERE. WE'VE ALREADY SEEN. UM, ARTICLE FIVE IS, UM, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. SO THESE ARE THINGS MORE SPECIFIC TO THE LARGER SITES. UM, AND SO WE'VE ADDED SOME CHANGES IN HERE, LIKE, UM, HOW PARKING IS CALCULATED. UM, ONE THAT TYLER MENTIONED IS PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT. I KNOW WE'LL PAUSE, YOU PROBABLY HAVE COMMENTS ON THIS ONE. UM, BUT WE WENT BACK AND FORTH WITH HOW THIS WAS MEASURED, BUT IT'S MEANT TO BE, UM, AS MENTIONED BEFORE, AND A BENEFIT TO USERS WHO WILL USE IT, I'LL SAY CORRECTLY AS INTENDED WITHIN A WALKABLE AREA IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF REQUIRED PARKING. AND SO, UM, WE DID ADD A BOUNDARY TO DEFINE THAT SO THAT THEY CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT. BUT TYLER, I'LL LET YOU CHIME IN. SURE. UM, SO MY MAIN HANGUP HERE WAS, UM, MY, LIKE I SAID IN THE WORK SESSION, MY ORIGINAL INTENTION HERE WAS AN, WAS AN OR CONDITION WHERE EVERY, UH, EVERY, YOU KNOW, PROPERTY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY SET BY, I BELIEVE IT'S BOUND BY KELLER SPRINGS, BELTLINE, ADDISON ROADIN, DNT, [01:30:01] UM, IF IT'S MAYBE AIRPORT. AIRPORT IT'S AIRPORT, YEAH. AND WHERE EVERY PROPERTY CONSIDERING DEVELOPMENT THERE WOULD BE AUTOMATICALLY HAVE THE OPTION TO HAVE THE 20% PARKING RELIEF. JUST BECAUSE I LIVE IN THIS BOUNDARY AND I CAN WALK TO THE TRANSIT STATION, IT'S REALLY FINE. I THINK IT'S PRACTICAL. AND THEN FOR PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THAT RADIUS THAT STILL MIGHT WORK, BUT YOU KNOW, YOU'RE LEAVING THAT HALF MILE RADIUS, YOU MIGHT NEED TO PUT IN A LITTLE BIT MORE, UM, WORK TO MAKE IT TRANSIT ACCESSIBLE FROM A WALKABLE OR BIKEABLE STANDPOINT, BUT IT'S STILL VERY POSSIBLE TO ALSO HAVE THAT OPTION. UM, I THINK COUNCIL TOOK IT AND MADE IT AN AND CONDITION WHERE YOU'RE BOTH INSIDE THE BOUNDARY AND ALSO HAVE TO HAVE THESE THREE THINGS MM-HMM . WHICH IS ACTUALLY MORE COMPLICATED THAN THE ORIGINAL UDC. UM, SO WHEREAS I LIKE THE EXTENDED BOUNDARY AND I WANT US TO KEEP THAT. I'D REALLY LIKE ALSO TO SAY THE BOUNDARY IS, IS A WIN CONDITION FOR HAVING THAT OPTION BECAUSE IT JUST GIVES PROPERTY DEVELOPERS A LITTLE BIT MORE FREEDOM, UH, TO EXERCISE PARKING FLEXIBILITY. UM, THAT WOULD BE MY PREFER. UM, ALTERNATIVELY, I DID NOTICE THAT THE CRITERIA DIDN'T INCLUDE A BIKE LANE, AND IF I WEREN'T IN SUCH A GOOD MOOD, I COULD MAKE A A, A SMART COMMENT. BUT, UM, I THINK, UH, WE MIGHT WANNA ALSO ADD THAT TO THE CONDITIONS IF IT'S, UM, SO 5 5 6 B ONE A DEFINES THE, UH, STREET SCAPE ELEMENT OR SEE WITHIN 200 LINEAR FEET, MAYBE WE COULD DO SOMETHING SIMILAR FOR A BIKE LANE. I'D BE WILLING TO COMPROMISE THERE. SO IF YOU'RE CLOSE ENOUGH TO A BIKE LANE AND ALSO HAVE THE, UM, THE, THE OTHER CONDITIONS KIND OF SET, I, I, I, I COULD LIVE WITH THAT BECAUSE IT IS STILL TECHNICALLY AN IMPROVEMENT. WE HAVE A BIT MORE FLEXIBILITY. UM, BUT IF WE COULD CARRY TO THE COUNCIL THAT I'M, I'M RECOMMENDING A IN BOUNDARY OR OUTSIDE BOUNDARY WITH THESE ADDITIONAL THINGS. AND ALSO I THINK EITHER WAY, JUST AT THE BIKE LANE YEAH. AS, AS AN OPTION FOR, UH, RELIEF. OKAY. LET ME MAKE SURE I HAVE IT CORRECT. SO YOU'RE SAYING WITHIN THE BOUNDARY AND AUTOMATIC APPLY YEAH. RIGHT. AND THEN WITHOUT, YOU HAVE TO MEET IT, IT'S DROPPED IT AS THREE OR MORE CRITERIA. YEAH, YEAH, I'M FINE. I'M FINE WITH THE THREE. AND THEN ADD THE BIKE LANE AS A, AS A CRITERIA, UM, FOR, FOR ACCEPTANCE. OKAY. UM, PREVIOUSLY THERE WAS A DISCUSSION ABOUT LIKE A HALF MILE MM-HMM . OH, OH, HALF A MILE WOULD BE SUPER. UM, BUT, BUT ALSO THE, THE BOUNDARY CONDITION SET IS MORE THAN ACCEPTABLE. OKAY. NOTED. THANK YOU. UM, YOU SUMMARIZE, I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED AS TO YES. KIND OF PUT A, A LOT OF PIECES IN THERE. YES. SO THE PROXIMITY TO TRANSIT SECTION IS APPLYING CURRENTLY AS DRAFTED AN AUTOMATIC, UM, OPTION TO REDUCE PARKING. SO IF SOMEBODY'S WITHIN THAT BOUNDARY AND THE SECOND BULLET THERE, WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY ADDISON CIRCLE, UM, SPECIAL AREA BOUNDARY, THEN THEY CAN JUST REQUEST A REDUCTION OF PARKING. BUT WHAT TYLER WAS, UM, ASKING FOR IS KIND OF TWO OPTIONS TO DO THAT. SO WITHIN THE BOUNDARY YOU CAN JUST REQUEST AND HAVE APPLIED A REDUCTION, AND THEN WITHIN SOUNDS LIKE A HALF MILE BEYOND THE BOUNDARY POTENTIALLY. THEN YOU COULD ALSO REQUEST IT, BUT YOU HAVE TO MEET THREE OR MORE CRITERIA AS OUTLINED IN THE LIST, WHICH INCLUDES PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS. SO ELSEWHERE IN THE CODE WE REFERENCE THIS. UM, BUT BASICALLY LIKE SOME OF THE CONDITIONS SAY YOU NEED TO EXCEED THE MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY THAT ARE LISTED IN LIKE ARTICLE ELSEWHERE IN ARTICLE FIVE. SO THINGS LIKE THAT. SO HE IS SAYING ADD BIKE LANES AS A POTENTIAL QUALIFIER. UM, THINGS LIKE THAT. SO THINGS TO THINK ABOUT, OKAY, UH, JUMP, LEMME JUMP IN HERE. UH, MAYBE I'M NOT THINKING ABOUT THIS RIGHT. BUT, SO YOU'RE TALKING A PROJECT HALF A MILE OUTSIDE THIS BOUNDARY, OKAY. MM-HMM . YOU'RE GONNA MAKE THAT ONE PROJECT. DO THESE REQUIREMENTS, LET'S USE THE PEDESTRIAN OR THE BIKE LANE, WHATEVER. IT'S NOT CREATING ANY CONNECTIVITY BECAUSE THERE'S GONNA BE POINTS BETWEEN THAT HALF MILE BORDER TO GET YOU TO THE ADDISON BOUNDARY AREA OR WHATEVER THAT PROBABLY AREN'T GONNA HAVE THOSE SAME ITEMS INSTALLED. CORRECT. POTENTIALLY, YEAH. OKAY. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW THAT THIS IS CREATING ANY MORE, I DON'T KNOW THAT CONNECTIVITY IS THE RIGHT WORD, BUT I JUST FEEL LIKE YOU'RE TRYING TO FORCE SOMETHING FOR VERY SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT SITES THAT ARE NOT, UM, COHESIVE FROM POINT A TO POINT B. ANY OTHER THOUGHTS ON THAT? JUST AS [01:35:01] A FOLLOW UP? ARE, ARE YOU, ARE WE BEING ASKED TO VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT? YEAH. UH, YES. , WITH, WITH ALL OF THESE, JUMP THROUGH THESE HOOPS. OKAY. THANK YOU. YES. YOU CAN, UH, VOTE TO APPROVE WITH CONDITIONS AND WOULD NEED TO BE SPECIFIC WITH THOSE CONDITIONS. SO IF THERE'S MORE COMMISSIONERS WHO AGREE WITH TYLER'S DIRECTION THERE, THEN THAT'D BE IMPORTANT TO BE SPECIFIC ON. I THINK MY, MY FUNDAMENTAL ASK IS IF YOU'RE WITHIN, IF, IF YOU'RE WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE OF ADDISON CIRCLE, AND REMEMBER THE ORIGINAL UDC PUT THIS TOWN HALL BARELY AT THE EDGE OF WALKING DISTANCE FOR THE PARKING REDUCTION. IF YOU'RE, IF IN WALKING DISTANCE OF ADDISON TRANSIT CENTER, WHICH I THINK THIS ADDISON CIRCLE SPECIAL AREA STUDY BOUNDARIES ARE, ARE, ARE SOLID, YOU KNOW, 85% AT LEAST WE SHOULD JUST LET THEM HAVE THE OPTION. THESE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA I THINK IS JUST A BIT MORE, TOO MUCH GOVERNMENT OVERBEARING IN A DISTRICT THAT'S ALREADY PRETTY WALKABLE. AND I JUST WANT TO GIVE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THIS INCREASINGLY MIXED USE TRANSIT HEAVY DISTRICT, UM, THE ABILITY TO EXERCISE THAT. RIGHT. THAT'S NOT THE ISSUE THAT I'M TAKING WITH YOUR COMMENTS THAT YOU MADE. YEAH, I DON'T, I DON'T, I TOTALLY, I'M FINE WITH THE PRODUCTION AND PARKING WITHIN THIS AREA, WHATEVER. WHAT WHAT I'M GETTING IS, IS I DON'T KNOW WHAT OUTSIDE OF THIS AREA AND THE NEXT HALF MILE BOUNDARY, WHAT YOU'RE GETTING ACCOMPLISHED BY TRYING TO DO WHAT YOU'VE ASKED, BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S CREATING ANY MORE CONNECTIVITY. 'CAUSE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE SITES IN BETWEEN THERE THAT AREN'T HAVING THE SAME FACTORS THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO FORCE ON THIS NEXT GROUP. NO, THAT'S FAIR. UM, AND, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE TALKING RAW LAND, I THINK WE'RE HAVING A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION, BUT WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT RAW LAND. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DEVELOPED SITES ALREADY, SO MM-HMM . SO I, I EITHER NEED YOU TO EXPLAIN TO ME WHY YOU THINK THIS IS SO IMPORTANT OR WHAT YOU'RE GETTING AT VERSUS JUST THROWING MORE RULES AND STIPULATIONS ON PEOPLE THAT, THAT DON'T SEEM TO BE CREATING ANY COHESIVENESS TO ME. YEAH. I GUESS, YOU KNOW, OUTSIDE OF THE KIND OF THE WALKABLE BOUNDARY, I, I CAN SEE IT DOES GET A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT AND THERE MIGHT BE YEAH. THE IN-BETWEEN PROPERTIES, I THINK THAT'S TOTALLY FAIR. UM, AND THAT'S NOT, THAT'S NOT THE HILL I'M GONNA DIE ON. HOWEVER, THERE'S A COUPLE OF, OF, OF, OF SECTIONS THAT MIGHT MAKE SOME SENSE. LIKE I THINK THE COUNCIL DID APPROVE, UM, SOUTH QUORUM, SOUTH OF BELTLINE, WHICH WOULD BE OUTSIDE OF THIS, UH, STUDY, THEY'RE GONNA REDO, HAVE SOME ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN PATHS WIDE ENOUGH FOR A BIKE, UM, OFFICE HEAVY KIND OF MIX OF USES, WHICH I THINK IT'S NOT THE EASIEST WALK IN THE WORLD, BUT IT'S MORE THAN WALKABLE TO AS IN TRANSIT CENTER. SO LIKE SOMETHING JUST SOUTH OF BELTLINE I'D, I'D PROBABLY WANT THEM TO HAVE THE OPTION TO EXERCISE THAT TOO, GIVEN THAT THE TOWN ITSELF WILL BE BUILDING THE ENHANCED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY THAT WILL SATISFY MOST OF THOSE CONDITIONS. SO IF MEXICAN SUGAR SAYS, HEY, I DON'T WANNA REDO MY PARKING, BUT ADDISON IMPROV IS LIKE, I'D REALLY LIKE TO HAVE THAT SAME RIGHT, BUT THEY'RE JUST SEPARATED BY AN INTERSECTION. THAT'S KIND OF THE INTENT THERE. YOU KNOW, I I I THINK THIS IS A FAIRLY SIGNIFICANT CONVERSATION. UM, I'M PRO DEVELOPMENT, SO TO THE EXTENT WE CAN SPUR THAT, I'M ALL FOR IT. BUT I'M, I'M STRUGGLING A LITTLE BIT WITH GOING FROM A DEFINED BOUNDARY THAT WE'VE KIND OF ALL AGREED ON TO NOW EXPANDING IT SIGNIFICANTLY. UM, AND I DON'T REALLY KNOW THAT I'M PRO OR CON ON THIS. I'M JUST NOT QUITE SURE ALL THE PIECES AND PARTS THAT, THAT I'M SAYING IF WE DO IT, THIS IS WHAT'LL HAPPEN. SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANT TO DERAIL THIS PROCESS, AS YOU SAID, WE'RE WORKING ON THIS FOR A LONG TIME. SO MY PREFERENCE WOULD BE TO STICK WITH WHAT WE'VE GOT AND IF THIS IS A REALLY BURNING ISSUE, THEN WE DEAL WITH IT SECONDARILY AS SOME SORT OF AMENDMENT LATER ON. OKAY. UM, SO I WON'T GO ROLLING IN THE MUD FOR OUTSIDE OF THE SPECIAL AREA STUDY, BUT COULD, ARE WE COOL WITH THE BOUNDARY JUST BEING SUFFICIENT AND NOT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT THESE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA WITHIN THAT BOUNDARY? 'CAUSE THAT'S REALLY WHAT I'M GOING FOR. SO FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE, YOU'RE SAYING, HEY, IF WE JUST SAY, IF YOU'RE IN THIS BOUNDARY, YOU GET, IF YOU CHOOSE, YOU GET THE 20, WHATEVER THE PARKING EXPERIENCE IS. EXACTLY, YES. PERIOD. FULL STOP. 20%. YEAH, I AM ACTUALLY, I'M OKAY WITH THAT, THAT IT'S BEYOND THAT, THE STUFF. YEAH, I CAN LIVE WITH THAT. THANK YOU. OKAY. OKAY. BOUNDARY. OKAY. UM, YEAH, ARTICLE FIVE, LOTTERY TREE, UM, CHANGES, WHICH WE SPOKE ABOUT ALREADY. A LOT OF IT IS TREE MEASUREMENT, TREE PERMIT CHANGES, FENCING, SIGNAGE. UM, THESE ARE JUST MEANT TO MAKE THINGS CLEARER. WE'RE JUST CHANGING, UM, SOME STANDARDS. ONE EXAMPLE OF THIS IS UNDEVELOPED REAL ESTATE SIGNS. UM, SO WE HAD A LOT OF FEEDBACK FROM THE REALTY COMMUNITY ABOUT THIS AND ARE [01:40:01] CHANGING THE STANDARD BACK TO ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT WAS INTENDED TO BE PREVIOUSLY SO THAT YOU CAN HAVE YOUR REAL ESTATE SIGNAGE, UM, ANYWHERE, BUT YOU'RE LIMITED IN THE SIZE OF IT. AND IT'S NOT JUST ON END UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES, WHICH WAS A CHANGE THAT WE MADE WHEN WE ADOPTED THE UDC. SO JUST AN EXAMPLE OF MINOR CHANGES THAT WE ARE MAKING TO RESPOND TO. UM, ESSENTIALLY THE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY. ARTICLE SIX, UM, TOUCHED ON THIS. SO, PARKS DEPARTMENT WENT THROUGH A VERY LONG PROCESS TO CREATE THE PARK, UM, DEDICATION FEE CALCULATIONS. AND DURING THAT PROCESS, UM, WE DISCOVERED THAT THE INTENDED FEE REDUCTION DIDN'T GET CODIFIED. AND SO WE FIXED IT WITH THIS. ARTICLE SEVEN IS USES, SO ANYTHING THAT WAS ADDED IN ARTICLE FOUR, WE ADDED A DEFINITION TO. UM, SO THAT'S LARGELY WHAT THOSE ARE. AND THEN WE ADDED SOME DEFINITIONS FOR THE AIRPORT, UM, JUST BECAUSE WE DO COORDINATE WITH THE AIRPORT QUITE A BIT WHEN IT COMES TO, UM, THEIR KIND OF LEASE PROCESS. AND WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THOSE LANGUAGES ALIGN AND SO THAT THE TENANTS THAT ARE HOPING TO FINALIZE A LEASE WITH OUR AIRPORT, UM, STAFF ARE AWARE OF THE PROCESS TO GO THROUGH DEVELOPMENT. AND SO JUST ADDED SOME DEFINITIONS TO MAKE THOSE CLEARER FOR EVERYBODY. AS YOU CAN SEE, A LOT OF AIRPORT DEFINITIONS THERE. AND THEN LASTLY, APPENDIX A. SO THIS IS A CLEANUP ITEM. APPENDIX A HAS, UM, SIGN DISTRICT GRAPHICS IN THERE, AND WE DISCOVERED THAT ONE OF THE SIGN DISTRICT'S GRAPHICS WERE, UM, WAS MISSING. SO ADDED THAT IN AND THEN, UM, REFERENCES TO THE ORDINANCES FOR THAT. AND THAT'S IT. SO I DO HAVE THE NOTES FROM TODAY. UM, WE WILL BE LOOKING FOR A MOTION WITH SPECIFIC SOUNDS LIKE CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO THAT. UM, BUT AFTERWARDS, AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THE FINAL STEP OF THIS IS APPROVAL AT COUNCIL, HOPEFULLY ON NOVEMBER 10TH. SO, MRS. ANY MORE COMMENTS? OKAY. AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN. I I HAVE A QUICK COMMENT. OKAY. I THINK, I THINK BECAUSE OF THE LACK OF PARKING HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS A MAJOR CAUSE OF, OF FAILING BUSINESSES ON THE CIRCLE, I I JUST DON'T SEE WHY WE WOULD MAKE THAT ANOTHER OPTION FOR BUSINESS OWNERS IN, IN THAT AREA AT ALL. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S REALLY LACK OF, I MEAN, PEOPLE WILL SAY IT'S LACK OF PARKING. I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S PARKING QUANTITY, IT'S PROBABLY WAYFINDING AND A FEW OTHER THINGS THAT MAY HAVE MADE, UH, IT'S EITHER PARKING. IT'S NOT NO, NO, I THINK IT'S, IT'S LIKE A PARKING, IT'S A CONVENIENCE FACTOR IS WHAT HE'S, AND I I THINK THAT'S FAIR. PEOPLE WILL BLAME IT AS PARKING, BUT IT'S 'CAUSE THEY DON'T, THEY CAN'T PULL UP RIGHT OUT THE CURB OUT FRONT AND THEY EITHER HAVE TO GO TO A PARKING GARAGE OR A BLOCK AWAY, WHICH GOES AGAINST TYLER'S NEED AND WANT FOR MORE WALKABILITY. BUT THE FACT REMAINS THAT THAT'S, THAT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AND CONTINUES TO BE ONE OF THE STRUGGLES OF THE BUSINESSES IN THE CIRCLE. RIGHT. BUT I GUESS WHAT I'M GETTING AT TO MAKE THAT WORSE MAKES IT'S, I DON'T KNOW, THAT MAKE IT WORSE, BUT IT, I MEAN, THIS IS ONLY A BEING THERE FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT. SO IT'S, IT'S NOT GONNA AFFECT, UNLESS SOMEBODY'S GONNA BULLDOZE SOMETHING DOWN IN ADDISON CIRCLE THAT THAT'S NOT PROBABLY GONNA AFFECT, WELL, WE SEE THAT HAPPEN IN ALL OVER TOWN. I DON'T KNOW WHY IT COULDN'T HAPPEN THERE. IT, IT CAN, BUT I MEAN, THAT, THAT'S MY, AGAIN, I DON'T THINK DEVELOPERS BUILD PROJECTS TO FAIL. I MEAN, I, I DON'T, I DON'T THINK I CAN SUPPORT THE AMENDMENT TO WHAT, WHAT'S ON THE TABLE. WELL, IT'S AN OPTION FOR BUSINESSES. IT'S NOT, WE'RE NOT MANDATING THAT THEY REDUCE THEIR PARKING. UH, WE'RE SIMPLY GIVING PROPERTY OWNERS MORE FLEXIBILITY. YEAH. I WOULD SAY THAT'S A, THAT'S A BUSINESS DECISION. IF YOU'RE GOING IN, YOU, YOU HAVE THAT CHOICE, BUT IT CAN HURT OTHER BUSINESSES THAT ARE NEIGHBORS. RIGHT. WELL, I MEAN, I THINK IT'S DIFFERENT IN, IN, IN, UH, ADDISON CIRCLE. 'CAUSE MOST OF THE BUILDINGS ARE OWNED BY A PERSON. AND SO THE SUITES THAT ARE INDIVIDUAL, THE PARKING REDUCTION WOULD BE SET AT THAT LEVEL, NOT LIKE SUITE TO SUITE. SO, UM, ASTORIA WOULDN'T BE COMPETING WITH THE SALON NEXT DOOR FOR PARKING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT BECAUSE THAT WOULD BE SET BY MAA WHO RUNS THE BUILDING, WHETHER OR NOT THEY EXERCISE THE OPTION. OKAY. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? OKAY, THANK YOU. WITH THAT, WE'LL OPEN UP THIS ITEM FOR PUBLIC PUBLIC COMMENT. WE DID RECEIVE, ALL THE COMMISSIONERS WERE PROVIDED PUBLIC COMMENT FROM A PAUL C BLANCO, UM, WHICH WERE MORE IN [01:45:01] REFERENCE TO HIS CONCERNS ABOUT NON-CONFORMING STATUS, WHICH, UH, I DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH. BUT LESLIE, DO YOU WANNA SPEAK ABOUT IT AT ALL? SURE. UM, LESLIE KNIGHT, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT AND NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES, UM, SOME OF THE CONCERNS, UM, SHARED WERE REALLY IN RELATION TO LIKE NON-CONFORMITY AND, AND LEGAL NONCONFORMITY OR E OR ILLEGAL NONCONFORMITY CONFORMITY, EXCUSE ME. UM, THOSE WOULD DEFAULT TO OUR NON-CONFORMITY SECTION, WHICH IS I BELIEVE 1.6 SECTION 1.6 OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. UM, AND IS, UM, BROADLY SPEAKING TO THAT SUBJECT, IS ANY BUSINESS REGARDLESS OF LAND USE, IT ALSO APPLIES TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AS WELL. UM, IF THEY'RE OPERATING LEGALLY TODAY, UM, THIS IS THE SAME, UM, CONVERSATION AS WHEN THE UDC WAS FIRST ADOPTED. THEY'RE, UM, OPERATING LEGALLY TODAY, THEN THEY ARE CONSIDERED LEGAL NONCONFORMING AND THEY WOULD FOLLOW THOSE STANDARDS, WHICH GENERALLY ALLOWS THEM TO OPERATE IN THEIR, UM, CURRENT CAPACITY, UM, FOR AS LONG AS THEY SO CHOOSE TO, TO OPERATE. UM, THERE ARE, UM, LIMITATIONS TO, UM, SIGNIFICANT EXPANSION, BUT THAT GENERALLY DOES NOT INCLUDE HINDRANCES TO MAINTENANCE OR REPAIRS. UM, IN SOME CASES IT COULD ALLOW, UM, VERY MINOR EXPANSION OR ENHANCEMENTS, I SHOULD SAY, NOT EXPANSION ENHANCEMENTS TO A BUSINESS, UM, IF THEY CHOOSE TO CONTINUE COMMENTS HERE. SO JUST A SANITY CHECK. IS THERE ANYTHING, UH, IN THE POINTS THAT THEY'RE ASKING A RESPONSE FOR THAT YOU GUYS WOULD LIKE, UH, P AND Z DIRECTION ON? OR IS THAT MOSTLY KIND OF CLERICAL STUFF THAT YOU CAN ANSWER BASED ON WHAT WE'VE ALREADY COVERED? NOT REALLY A P AND Z ISSUE. UM, I DON'T, UM, FEEL LIKE WE NEED STAFF NEEDS ANY FEEDBACK ON THESE ITEMS. UM, UH, FOR, FOR REFERENCE, I GUESS THERE IS ONE QUESTION ASKING ABOUT, UM, A POSSIBLE EFFECTIVE DATE, UH, FOR THESE AMENDMENTS, UM, THAT HASN'T BEEN FORMALLY SET YET BECAUSE IT HASN'T BEEN TO CITY COUNCIL AND IT WOULD BE SET DURING THE ADOPTION TIME. UM, STAFF HAS CONTEMPLATED A, UM, DECEMBER 1ST, UH, EFFECTIVE DATE. UM, BUT ONCE AGAIN, THAT WOULD NOT BE FINALIZED UNTIL, UM, ACTED ON BY CITY COUNCIL. MM-HMM. AND I THINK MAYBE, MAYBE THERE, UM, WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE. 'CAUSE WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE, AND, AND, AND I PERSONALLY DISAGREE WITH THIS, BUT I'VE USED A LOT OF POLITICAL CAPITAL TONIGHT ON THE, UH, HOURS FOR HOOKAH LOUNGES. WE'RE CUTTING THEM IN HALF ESSENTIALLY FOR A LOT OF THESE, THESE, THESE LOUNGES. PERHAPS WE COULD HAVE A ONLY GO FORWARD, ONLY GOING FORWARD. SO, SO, SO EVERYTHING, AM I MISSING THAT LIKE IT'S A NINE HE GETS TO OPERATE IF HE OPENS? NOT HIM PERSONALLY, BUT ANYBODY IN TOWN THAT ALREADY OPERATES PAST 11 STILL OPERATES PAST 11. OH. UNTIL THEY MAKE SOME MASSIVE CHANGES. THERE'S ONLY NEW PEOPLE THAT COME BEFORE US NOW AND ASK FOR A PERMIT GOING FORWARD. OH, OKAY. ANY, ANY LEGALLY OPERATING BUSINESS TODAY CAN CONTINUE TO LEGALLY OPERATE, UM, AS OUTLINED IN THE NONCONFORMITY SECTION, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO CONTINUE, UM, FOR THE REMAINDER IN TIME UNTIL THEY CHOOSE TO CHANGE THEIR BUSINESS OR LEAVE VOLUNTARILY. OKAY. THEN I'LL, I'LL LET THAT REST. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? OKAY. AT THIS TIME I'LL CONTINUE OPEN PERIOD TO SEE IF ANY PUBLIC COMMENTS IF YOU'D COME LIKE, TO COME SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE OR ANYONE ONLINE. JADE, YOU'RE NOT SHADED HIM AWAY FROM SCARING 'EM AWAY FROM THE PODIUM. ARE YOU ? OKAY. OKAY. I'LL ASSUME THAT'D BE NONE SINCE I DIDN'T SEE ANYBODY STAND UP AND NO ONE'S ONLINE. OKAY. THANK YOU. UM, DO I HAVE A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE UDC AMENDMENTS CONDITIONED ON STAFF REVISING 3.8 0.2 SO THAT ANY NEW LARGER BUILDING OR ANY NEW OR EXPANDED COMMERCIAL USE IN THE PARK OVERLAY REQUIRE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CHAIR. CAN I ADD MY THING ON TOP OF THAT? OR DOES ONE SECOND? DOES THIS WORK ON? HOLD ON ONE MINUTE AT A TIME. ONE AT A TIME. AT A TIME. SO NOW I NEED A MOTION TO APPROVE TYLER'S, UM, AMENDMENT. SARAH TYLER'S PROPOSING TO AMEND ALAN'S MOTION. NO, HE'S, HE'S, OH, SORRY. SEPARATE AMENDMENT. YEAH, I WANT TO TALK ABOUT 5, 5 6. OH, SORRY. IT WAS YOU I'M SORRY. I GET IT BACKWARD. I WAS THINKING TYLER JUMPED IN THERE, APPROVE HIS MOTION TO AMEND, HAVE THE MOTION THAT WE NEED EITHER NEED A SECOND OR TO APPROVE YES. SECOND. OKAY. BUT WE'RE NOT MOVE TO AMEND AND THEN WE CAN GO TO THE NEXT ONE THAT GETS ADMITTED IS WHAT I'M GETTING AT. OKAY. SO, SO IF THEY APPROVE NOW, SORRY, IF THEY APPROVE NOW, ARE WE DONE OR? YES. OKAY. YEAH. SO I DO WANT THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD THAT THAT'S WHERE I'M GETTING AT. DO THE AMENDMENTS ALL NEED TO TAKE PLACE NOW OR DO WE VOTE ON EACH AMENDMENT IS WHAT I'M ASKING? INDEPENDENTLY MAKE ALL THE MOTIONS. NOW HE CAN MOVE TO AMEND ALAN'S [01:50:01] MOTION OR HE CAN PROPOSE HIS OWN AMENDMENT. OKAY. WELL IT'S AN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT RIGHT ON. YEAH. 'CAUSE I GOT NO ROOM WITH ALAN'S MOTION. DON'T SECOND IT YET. I ALREADY SECOND IT. HE NO, HE CAN, I DIDN'T EVEN CALL FOR IT YET, SO HOLD ON. NO. POSES AN ADDITIONAL AMENDMENT. I I GET THAT. BUT NOW JIMMY'S WORRIED THAT HE ALREADY CALLED US MOTION EVEN THOUGH I DIDN'T CALL FOR IT A SECOND. SO ARE WE GOOD OR SHOULD WE JUST START FROM SCRATCH? THE MOTION CAN BE IN THIS TIME OR NOT. YEAH. YEAH. I CAN IGNORE JIMMY'S TRYING TO SECOND IT WHAT HE JUST DID A MINUTE AGO, EVEN THOUGH I DIDN'T CALL FOR IT CAN STILL, THERE CAN STILL BE A MOTION TO AMEND THE MOTION ON THE TABLE. SO AMEND OR, OR ADDRESS THIS SECOND. WHICH ARE YOU SAYING? WHAT DID YOU SECOND? I SECONDED ALAN ALAN'S COMMENT RIGHT NOW. ALL I UNDERSTAND IS THAT ALAN MADE A CORRECT AND I DID NOT CALL FOR A MOTION. I DID NOT ASK FOR A SECOND YET. SO CAN WE GO ON TO TYLER'S RIGHT NOW? THERE WAS ALREADY A SECOND 'CAUSE HE JUMPED IN. OKAY, SO AMEND, BUT HE CAN STILL MOVE TO AMEND THE MOTION THAT'S ON HIS EMAIL. RIGHT ON. GO AHEAD TYLER. THANK YOU CHAIR. OKAY. I WOULD LIKE ALSO TO ADD AN, AN AMENDMENT FOR, UH, SECTION 5 5 6 B UM, TO SIMPLY SET THE BOUNDS, UM, OF THE ADDISON CIRCLE AR SPECIAL AREA STUDY ALREADY DESCRIBED AS SUFFICIENT FOR THE OPTION FOR PARKING REDUCTION AND REMOVE THE ADDITIONAL CRITERIA. OKAY. ANY OTHER AMENDMENTS? OKAY. DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. DO WE HAVE A HOW MANY YAYS? YAY. YAY. ANY NAYS? NAY. OKAY. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY, GOT THE COUNT. YES. WAIT, SO THE AMENDMENT CARRIED AND NOW WE HAVE TO VOTE ON THE MOTION. NO MOTION. OKAY. NOW TO HAVE A MOTION FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE UDC WITH THE AMENDMENT, ALAN'S AMENDMENT. AND ALAN, DO YOU WANNA, JUST SO I UNDERSTAND, IS THERE ANY, DO YOU WANNA CLARIFY ANY FURTHER TO REMOVE THE TERM APPROVAL FROM THAT SECTION, UM, THAT WE DISCUSSED? WELL, AGAIN, I, I'D LEFT MY LANGUAGE GENERAL BECAUSE I THOUGHT YOU WOULD HAVE, YOU MAY HAVE TO AMEND OTHER SECTIONS AND THAT'S THE ONLY PART I COULD, OKAY. SO, UH, IF YOU WANT, I CAN READ IT AGAIN, BUT ALL I'M SAYING IS THAT WE SHOULD RE, WE SHOULD REVISE SECTION 3 8 2 SO THAT ANY NEW OR LARGER BUILDING OR ANY NEW OR EXPANDED COMMERCIAL USE IN THE PARK OVERLAY REQUIRES A SPECIAL USE PERMIT. OKAY. AND I THINK THAT GOT IT. BUT YOU GUYS MAY SAY THAT DOESN'T QUITE FIX IT AND YOU HAVE TO DO OTHER LANGUAGE, IN WHICH CASE PLEASE OBVIOUSLY YOU'D HAVE TO MAKE THE IT AGREE WITH THE MOTION. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING. OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION FOR, DO WE NEED A FULL SENTENCE OF THE APPROVAL OF UDC OR JUST THE UDC? DOES SOMEBODY NEED TO READ THAT PARAGRAPH? JUST THE, I YOU CAN JUST SAY, UM, APPROVAL OF APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX H, UH, WITH THE TWO AMENDMENTS. OKAY. APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX H WITH THE TWO AMENDMENTS TO HAVE A MOTION. YEAH, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE APPROVAL. SORRY CHELSEA, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE APPROVAL OF ITEM SIX H WITH THE TWO AMENDMENTS. WE HAVE A SECOND. I SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? SO OPPOSED. OKAY, SO MOTION CARRIES. WITH THAT WE ARE ADJOURNED FOR THE EVENING. THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU. VERY WELCOME. SORRY. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.